Answer:
the anwser is a
Explanation:
im sorry if this is wrong im bad at social studies
In a feudal system<span>, a peasant or worker known as a vassal received a piece of land in return for serving a lord or king, especially during times of war. Vassals were expected to perform various duties in exchange for their own fiefs, or areas of land.
</span>Answer:
The rise of the Shogun position caused the Feudal System to solidify.
Explanation:
Japan had a vertically stratified society with Emperor at the top. The Emperor was a somewhat religious, hereditary position. The Emperor ruled by loyalty to his divine position rather than military might.
A feudal system is one which each class swears allegiances to their lord. The Lord trains and raises armies. Peasant and Samurai swear allegiance to the Daimyo. Daimyo to Shogun. The Shogun may or may not swear allegiance to to the Emperor. The Shogun ruled by military might.
The system was created because the Daimyo class began to get too powerful. Eventually one Daimyo took charge though military might. He became Shogun. Each Shogun had to establish his own authority. So there were many breaks in the rule. It was not a hereditary position until after 1603 and the Tokugawa Shogunate became Hereditary. This Shogunate lasted till 1868 when Admiral Perry's ships could not be stopped by the Shogun's forces.
In the 2018 mid terms, Democrats regained control in the house whole The Republicans tightened their hold on the senate.
Explanation:
The Congress has now a split vote share clearly visible<u> as most Governors would come from the Democrats but the Senate itself is run by the Republicans. </u>
There was also more number of women winning seats than they did in the previous elections. There was an expansion of voting rights for mid terms that allowed for a more free voting process.
<u>This reduces Donald Trump's powers considerably </u>and shows a better system of checks and balances to be imposed on a government.
This text makes a tour through the most important aspects of residents' attitudes towards the impact of tourism in relation to some of the most studied variables that attempt to explain the behaviour of residents. The heterogeneity of methodologies and different models or theories proposed to the present day, have not produced results with universal validity or efficacy, so these studies could be directed to the analysis of other variables beyond the tourism sector and especially focusing on local studies. Tourist destinations are places conditioned by history, tourist developments, social and cultural aspects which make each tourist area identified by factors that shape the zone. This paper opens a discussion on the limitations of the methods and theories developed for the study of resident attitudes towards tourism. The creation of a new framework of study that overcomes the identified problems is advocated.