Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
The orientation of philosophy which I adhere to is called Epicureanism
<h3>What is Epicureanism?</h3>
This refers to the school of philosophy that believes and advocates that pleasure is the highest good.
Hence, the father of this school of philosophy is known as Epicurus, a Greek philosopher he believed that when one removed anxiety and stress and pursued only pleasure, this would do him the most good.
Read more about Epicureanism here:
brainly.com/question/12837699
#SPJ12
Answer:
its a picture of green girl
Explanation:
The name of the state is New South Wales (NSW)
The New South Walse border equals to around 12.91% of border length extends<span> up to 2880- miles or 4635 </span>km<span> and its coastal </span>length<span> extends up to 1327 miles or 2137 </span>km, which borders the south Australia to its west, The Queensland to its north, and Victoria to the Sotu.
Answer:
no because we are who we are we dont need to change we can be a girl and be boyly and a boy and be girly
Explanation:
