Ethnicity could disrupt the peaceful life in a country in many ways. One of the major ways is through ethnic conflicts.
Ethnic conflicts often arise due to different ethnic groups competing for powers, resources, or territory.
Where there are ethnic conflicts between different or various ethnic groups, this may lead to violent conflicts, thereby causing the killing of humans through civil wars, vandalization, etc.
These saddening events may lead to disruption of the peaceful life of a country through things like:
- Internal displacement,
- Regional instability,
- Economic failures,
- Environmental disasters, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the main ways in which ethnicity disrupts the peaceful life in a country in many ways are through "Ethnic conflict."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/21006394
Answer-Computers have changed the way people relate to one another and their living environment, as well as how humans organize their work, their communities, and their time.
Answer:
The correct answer is E. landscapes
Explanation:
Landscapes are fluid, irregular, and variable global flows that produce different results throughout the world. it can also involve the flow of many different things, like people and ideas. There are also five types of landscapes that operate independently of each other.
The first alternative is correct.
Political economy can often be conflicting.
The main instruments of economic policy are monetary policy and fiscal policy. Both can be used to stimulate or discourage the economy. In this way, when they are adopted with the opposite sign, they are an example of conflict, as described in this exercise.
If the government wants to stimulate the economy through increased spending (expansionary fiscal policy), it will be injecting money into the economy. However, the main cause of inflation is excess currency in circulation. Thus, a contractionary monetary policy aims to wipe out the supply of money to contain inflation. That is, the first measure is inflationary to stimulate the economy, but the second is anti-inflationary, however contractionary.
<em>"Suppose the government and the Federal Reserve have conflicting goals. The government wants to encourage economic growth by </em><em>increasing spending</em><em>, but the Federal Reserve wants to decrease inflation by </em><em>decreasing the money supply</em><em>".</em>