Answer: $6,000,000
Explanation:
Hi, to answer this question we simply have to multiply the total market capital of the company (20,000,000) by the percentage under preferred stock (30%) in decimal form.
Mathematically speaking:
20,000,000 x (30/100) = $6,000,000
Feel free to ask for more if needed or if you did not understand something.
Answer:
a. $45 billion.
Explanation:
The aggregate expenditures must have fallen by = 0.75*$65 billion
= $45 billion
Therefore, The aggregate expenditures must have fallen by $45 billion.
Yes they colloids are used in food perparations like pastries and cakes
Answer: A Contract was formed on February 5th
Explanation:
The contract was formed the very day that Bob mailed Ann his acceptance which was on the 5th of February.
Ann attempted to revoke the acceptance too late as she did it a day after he had emailed his acceptance even though she only received it on the 7th.
The date she received the acceptance is of no consequence because this falls under the Posting Rule. This rule in Common Law countries essentially states an agreement is made as soon as the letter is posted even if it never gets to it's destination.
Answer:
Who is the franchisor? McDonald's
Who is the franchisee? C.B. Management Inc.
In a franchise relationship, the <u>franchisee</u> is economically dependent on the <u>franchisor's</u> business system.
The franchise relationship is defined by the <u>contract</u>.
Did C.B. Management, Inc.’s failure to make a payment due more than thirty days earlier constitute a breach of the franchise contract? YES
Why? A) the contract provided McDonald's could terminate the contract when a payment was more than 30 days late.
Did the contract provide that the acceptance of a late payment waived McDonald's right to terminate for late payments? NO
What does an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing require? That the parties act <u>reasonably</u>.
Did McDonald's act of accepting late payments in the past transform McDonald's right to terminate into a discretionary decision governed by the standard of good faith and fair dealing in the future? NO
Why? Which one of these reasons is not correct? B) the actions of the parties control this issue.
A court would likely find for <u>McDonald’s</u>