Well it raises the price of goods such as a juice bottle costing 3.00 dollars and adding a 4% increase to that price. also another aim is better jobs for people, making sure that everyone can find a job
Your current balance<span> is the amount of money in your account at the beginning of a business day. This amount does not include any pending deposits or withdrawals. Your </span>available balance<span> is your </span>current balance<span> minus any pending debit card purchases, automatic drafts, processing checks or other debits from your account</span>
The entity that pledges to make the interest and maturity payment for bond issues is called the <u>issuer.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>Who is a Bond issuer?</h3>
A bond is a completely fixed instrument that reflects an investor's debt to a borrower.
Bonds terms and conditions include the end date when the capital of the loan is scheduled to be paid to the bond owner with a fixed or variable interest payment.
Bond Issuers are businesses or entities that generate and take loans from people who buy bonds in exchange for periodic interest and repayment of the principal amount when the bonds mature.
Learn more about who is a Bond issuer here:
brainly.com/question/25525397
The answer that best fits the question is that 'when a shot will give a clean kill' because a firearm's killing range can be known or considered to be more effective if it has the capacity of providing a clean kill with only using a one shot and does not require for a second or more.
Answer:
No, it is not a valid argument for import protection
Explanation:
There are several arguments that are waged in favor of protectionism. One of the most common, that is seen in this question, in the unfair competition argument, in which domestic producers argue that producers from abroad pay unfair wages, or engage in dumping, or do not pay enough for raw materials.
The fact is, what is a substandard wage in the United States, is probably an average, or even higher-than-average wage in Indonesia, because wages are determined by the market conditions in each country. Indonesia, as a low-income country, has wages on average well below the average wage in the United States, a high-income country.
Therefore, domestic producers do not have any valid reason to demand import protection because Indonesian producers pay substantially lower wages than them. These are economic realities given by market conditions.
