The correct answer should be remove trade sanctions on Cuba.
Hope this helps. :D
The correct answer is Peru
Simon Bolivar and Jose de San Martin joined forces to help Peru and were successful at it. Although San Martin was not a Peruvian man but rather an Argentine, he was granted the title of the Protector of Peru, even though he lived and worked in Argentina. Eventually, he abandoned all governmental positions and moved to France where he died.
Answer:
The answer was already on brainly, so here.
Explanation:
The law known as Lex Agraria was created to calm the poor it said that they would buy 500 acres from the rich and give parts of the 500 acres land to the homeless war veterians after their term was up.
Trade flourished because these progressing empires were developing new ways to produce products and utilize agriculture in their areas, such as Han with silk and Rome with olives and fishing/seafaring. These empires has never had access to goods that were from other areas before the Silk road, causing trade to become immensely popular and relied upon.
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.