Answer:
The Sons of Liberty and the Daughters of Liberty were two groups who led the resistance to the Stamp Act.
Explanation:
Political cartoons are known as Editorial cartoons express political issues and policies in a humorous way in form of art. It may also include satire in its art exaggerating controversies and issues at times.
The sons of liberty and the daughters of liberty were formed in American British colonies during the American revolution. Their main purpose was to protest against the unjust taxation system of the British government on the colonies.
The Daughters of Liberty used to participate in spinning bees and help in producing homespun cloth for colonists to wear instead of British textiles. One can draw a cartoon of women depicted as 'Daughters of Liberty' spinning bees.
The Sons of Liberty were merchants, shopkeepers who fought against the taxation system by the British government. Their cartoon may have boys protesting and raising slogan against taxes.
If the Ferrets should go ahead to sign the young players they would be making a trade off between the superstar that can win the league and the 3 players.
<h3>What is a trade-off?</h3>
A trade off can be described to be the sacrifices that are made when a person decides to forego buying a good in order to purchase another good.
The team here would be foregoing having a superstar that can help them win the league for the three players that they went on to sign.
Read more on tradeoffs here:
brainly.com/question/13760478
Answer: please type in the choices to choose from
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is developmental psychopathy
Explanation:
Developmental psychopathology focuses on how and when psychological disorders develop and how they affect the outcome or totality of the life. Some of the disorders studied include autism, depression, and schizophrenia.
The correct answer is Universal conduct, based on Universal values
Happiness is the state in which a rational being is found in the world for whom, in all his existence, everything goes according to his desire and will; consequently, it presupposes the agreement of nature with all the ends of this being, and simultaneously with the essential foundation of determining its will. Now the moral law, as a law of freedom, obliges by means of foundations of determination, which must be entirely independent of nature and its agreement with our faculty of desire (as an engine). However, the rational agent that acts in the world is not simultaneously the cause of the world and of nature itself. Thus, in the moral law, there is no basis for a necessary connection between morality and happiness, provided with it, in a being that, being part of the world, depends on it; this being, precisely for this reason, cannot voluntarily be the cause of this nature nor, as far as happiness is concerned, make it, by its own strength, perfectly coincide with its own practical principles.
