Cost allocation can occasionally result in favoritism, with one department receiving significantly more if cost managers care for it more.
This kind of bias can also lead to a number of related problems, like rivalries, competition for resources, and the expansion of departmental requirements and ideas.
What justifies the allocation of support costs?
The management can use the important data that cost allocation provides about how costs are used to make decisions. It helps determine whether the departments or products are profitable enough to justify the costs allocated by displaying the cost objects that account for the majority of the costs.
Which procedure is used to allocate costs to the support department?
There are three ways to divide costs for the support department: the direct, the reciprocal, and the step-down. The assumptions regarding how services provided by one support department are distributed to other support departments are the primary distinctions between the methods.
Learn more about Cost allocation here:
brainly.com/question/28479949
#SPJ4
Answer:
Assume that a context switch takes T time. Suggest an upper bound (in terms of T) for holding a spinlock. If the spinlock is held for any longer, a mutex lock (where waiting threads are put to sleep) is a better alternative.
Explanation:
The top limit is to be twice the value of (2xT). Holding the spinlock for a longer time, it will be necessary to put the thread to sleep and get a context switch, so one process awakes the sleeping thread without the need of a second context switch.
In process synchronization, cooperating process can affect or be affected by other processes executing in the system, either directly share a logical address space, both code and data, or be allowed to share data only through files or messages, although concurrent access to shared data may result in data inconsistency. But there are several mechanisms to help the orderly execution of cooperating processes that share a logical address space, so that data consistency is kept.
Answer:
0.34
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what The manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) was closest to:
First step is to calculate the Throughput time using this formula
Throughput time = Process time + inspection time + move time + queue time
Let plug in the formula
Throughput time=6.1+1.5+4.1+6.2
Throughput time=17.9
Now let calculate the MEC using this formula
MEC = process time / throughput time
Let plug in the formula
MEC=6.1/17.9
MEC =0.34
Therefore The manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) was closest to:0.34
A national health<span> insurance </span>system<span>, or single-payer </span>system<span>, in which a single government entity acts as the administrator to collect all </span>health care<span> fees, and pay out all </span>health care<span> costs. Medical services are publicly financed but not publicly provided. Canada, Denmark, Taiwan, and Sweden </span>have<span> single-payer </span>systems<span>.</span>
Answer:
Spotlighter, Inc.
Cash
Account Titles Debit Credit
Beginning balance $0
Notes Payable $4,740
Common stock $5,430
Equipment $1,000
Supplies $1,100
Ending balance $8,070
Notes Payable
Account Titles Debit Credit
Beginning balance $0
Cash $4,740
Equipment 1,600
Ending balance $6,340
Common stock
Account Titles Debit Credit
Beginning balance $0
Cash $5,430
Equipment
Account Titles Debit Credit
Beginning balance $0
Cash $1,000
Notes Payable $1,600
Ending balance $2,600
Supplies
Account Titles Debit Credit
Beginning balance $0
Cash $1,100
Accounts Payable $1,500
Ending balance $2,600
Accounts Payable
Account Titles Debit Credit
Beginning balance $0
Supplies $1,500
Ending Balance $1,500
Explanation:
1) Data and Transaction Analysis:
a. Cash $4,740 Notes Payable $4,740
b. Cash $5,430 Common stock $5,430
c. Equipment $2,600 Cash $1,000 Notes Payable $1,600
d. Supplies $1,100 Cash $1,100
e. Supplies $1,500 Accounts Payable $1,500
