<span>Poor planning and no incentive is the answr</span>
The process was cognitive dissonance
This is the process where people have inconsistent thoughts and behave weirdly in their decision making. In this case, they correlated the prevention of the destruction of earth with their prayer, even though it had nothing to do with it. This is opposite of their previous statement which said that the world would end on that date.
Until the Supreme Court struck it down in 1915, many states used the "grandfather clause " to keep descendents of slaves out of elections. The clause said you could not vote unless your grandfather had voted -- an impossibility for most people whose ancestors were slaves.
<em><u>H</u></em><em><u>O</u></em><em><u>P</u></em><em><u>E</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>S</u></em><em><u>O</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>I</u></em><em><u>T</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>H</u></em><em><u>E</u></em><em><u>L</u></em><em><u>P</u></em><em><u>S</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Y</u></em><em><u>O</u></em><em><u>U</u></em>
The correct answer is students’ right to free speech in public schools.
In this Supreme Court, the issue of whether students have protected free speech in the schools as a result of actions by individuals like Mary Beth Tinker. Tinker, and some of her siblings/friends, wore black armbands to school with the peace sign on them. This expression was used to show the students anti-Vietnam War stance. Tinker was then punished by the school. After that, she brought her case to the legal system.
The Supreme Court ruled that this type of freedom of speech is protect because it does not disrupt the educational process.
Answer:
Looking back on history, we can often see patterns emerging just before dangerous or terrible events occurred. One example is the Holocaust during the Second World War. It's obvious to us—now—that the rise of authoritarianism, including fascism, was paving the way for leaders in many countries to command the obedience of whole populations, even when these leaders began to order the killing of civilians. We can see how Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and others began to attack journalists, control the flow of information, and stir up nationalism by persecuting ethnic minorities or invading desirable lands. In some ways, their actions were like experiments, pushing the boundaries of authoritarian rule to see what they could get away with. When nobody stopped them, they became bolder and more aggressive. This article details some of those experiments.
Explanation:
Hopefully this helps :)