Answer:
The reader can tell the sentence above is written in first person because it says I, not he, she, we, us.
Explanation:
Answer:
I disagree that the most rewarded people have the most dangerous or important job in society because there are people who are rich and have a successful life made their future by buisness or working very on their career. But as solider, who has a perilous job aren't being treated as importanted as they should be. They put their lives on the line, such as police officers, firemen, etc. And they are not being rewarded by either the government or citizens as much as they should be.
<span>Yes the Christian point of worldview meets the worldview test. Christianity tell us that a person should always be humble and should care for others. A person should understand the importance of forgiving a person even if other person is wrong. This view is also a phinalthrophic view and thus christianity view represents the worldview</span>
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
