Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Job group analysis.
Explanation:
Job group analysis is the evaluation carried out by a company to determine the amount of workforce available and the number of job positions required to cover the operations expected. Besides, it considers the diversity present among existing employees based on <em>age, race, gender or ethnicity</em> to mention a few examples.
Answer:
13.86%
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the flotation-adjusted (net) cost of its new common stock
Using this formula
Cost of new common stock(re) = [d1 / stock price (1-flotation cost)] +g
Let plug in the formula
Cost of new common stock(re)= [$1.36 / 33.35 (1 – 0.065)]+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)= [$1.36 / 33.35 (0.935)]+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)= [$1.36/31.182)+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)=0.04361+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)=0.1376*100
Cost of new common stock(re)=13.76%
Therefore the flotation-adjusted (net) cost of its new common stock will be 13.76%
Answer:
Dr. Cash $2,842
Dr. Discount Expense $58
Cr. Account Receivable $2,900
Explanation:
Terms 2/10, n/30 means there is a discount of 2% is available on payment of due amount within discount period of 10 days after sale with net credit period of 30 days.
Sales = $3,700
Returns = $800
Amount Due = $3,700 - $800 = $2,900
As the payment is made within discount period, so discount will be availed
Discount = $2,900 x 2% = $58
Cash Paid = $2,900 - $58 = $2,842
Answer:
$56,130
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what the amount of itemized deductions the Gibsons may claim for the year is
Stuart and Pamela Gibson
Casualty loss $17,430
[$53,200 – (10% × $357,700)]
Home mortgage interest 21,280
State tax 10,000
(18,000 income and 16,300 property
Limited to 10,000)
Charitable Contributions 28,700
Total itemized deductions $56,130
Therefore the amount of itemized deductions the Gibsons may claim for the year is $56,130
Answer: See explanation column for answer
Explanation:
Caroline
left Right
Anthonio left 6,6 6,3
Right 4,3 5,5
The first digits in both left and right is Anthonio's best response payoff given what Caroline chooses. Also, the second digit on both left and right is Caroline's best response payoff based on what Anthonio chooses.
When Antonio chooses left, Caroline should choose left so as to get a payoff of 6, also when Antonio chooses right, Caroline chooses right to get a payoff of 5. therefore, there is no dominant strategy for Caroline.
The dominant strategy for Antonio occurs
When Caroline chooses left, Antonio will have to choose left to get a payoff of 6, also when Caroline chooses right, Antonio should choose left to get a payoff of 6. So, the dominant strategy for Antonio is to choose left.
The only dominant strategy in this game is for Antonio, to choose left.
b). For Nash Equilibrum, Antonio will have to choose his dominant strategy, that is to choose left, which will make Caroline is to choose left so as to get a payoff of 6. So, the Nash equilibrium is for Antonio to choose <u>left </u>and caroline chooses<u> left</u> too
