Electrostatics is what you call a very scary electrostatic discharge.
Answer:
rapport
Explanation:
Rapport means close and harmonious relationship. In sales and marketing building relationship is crucial factor. It becomes even more important if the client is new and potential one. To develop relationship, it is important to that person involved have similar attitude, behavior or interest. This helps in generating positive perspective from other person and show reciprocal behavior. It helps to develop favorable verbal and non verbal interaction among the people involved.
In the problem mentioned Steve wanted to develop positive image so that interaction can be taken forward positively. Hence, he begins talking about thing in which client has interest. In doing so he is trying establish rapport with the client.
Answer:
Kosslyn's experiment found that the brain activity in the visual cortex:
<u>Plays a causal role in both perception and imagery.</u>
Explanation:
The investigation over the visual cortex done by Kossy, discovered that mental imaginary would activate the area of the visual cortex. This is so important because it proves that the brain, specifically this part, can operate without the real visual stimuli.
In other words the experiment proved that the visual cortex is not exclusivly activated when visual stimuli is present. This part of the brain can be activated by mental representation of for instance and object.
This experiment is important for the understangin of perception and memory.
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
