Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
Answer: True
Explanation: This quiz question explains the relationship between income and demand.
Answer:
$28,800
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
The asset is depreciable under the 5 year MACRS category
Depreciation percentages for all six years are:
0.20, 0.32, 0.192, 0.115, 0.115, 0.058
Worth of the asset = $150,000
Now,
Depreciation to be claimed in the year 3 will be
= Worth of the asset × Depreciation percentages for the year 3
here, from the given percentages of the depreciation
the Depreciation percentages for the year 3 is 0.192
= $150,000 × 0.192
= $28,800
Answer:
$434,000
Explanation:
The total amount that should be included in the operating income as follows:
1. Cash sales $135,000
2. Credit sales $289,000
3. Gain from the sale of property and the equipment $10,000
Operating income $434,000
hence, the $434,000 should be included in the operating income