Answer:
1. The phrase that states the purpose of the the passage of the Declaration of Independence is: D.To dissolve the political bands.
2. The phrase that most describes the passage is: Discomfort can be endured, but abuse will not be tolerated.
3. The anser is Pathos.
4. This lines are the example fo the use of ethos.
5. These lines from the Declaration of Independence are an expample of the use of purpose.
Explanation:
1.The document talks about how if any human finds necessary to separate or dissolve a political band, if it is important as a decent thing to do, to declare the causes by which they decide to do so.
2. The passage talks about how suffering and usurpations are constantly tolerated by the people. People shouldn´t tolarate governments of opression, as such it is their duty to throw such governments.
3. It should be pathos because it talks about how their petitions had been answered whith injuyries. The meaning of pathos means suffering.
4. It talks about how a group of people should live, in this case as Free and Independent States.
5. To have a purpose when writting is a very important tool to achieve or conquer objetives, in this case the right to be free and independent.
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read the article 'Battle of the Bionics,' by Steve Murray (MUSE Magazine October 2016)
How does the section titled “A World of Challenges” develop the author’s claims about the Cybathlon?
The section describes the excitement and energy participants exhibit during competition at the Cybathlon.
The section provides background information about the Cybathlon and the vision of its founder.
The section expresses that the Cybathlon is more of a research platform than a true competition.
The section implies that the Cybathlon is essentially a new and improved version of the Paralympics.
Answer: The section expresses that the Cybathlon is more of a research platform than a true competition
Explanation:
The author´s description of what Robert Riener, founder of Cybathlon, envisioned with this project makes it clear that it´s not really about the competition itself, but a way to promote the development of new engineering approaches aimed to, and also creating awareness about, the needs of people with physical disabilities.
Answer:
Ananta is <u>a</u> CA member
Answer:
1.- No and yes, they should be forgiven by society in order to move on.
2.- The spouse are to "blame" and it's not justified and no one can say that its was pushed to cheat.
Explanation:
1.- People who commit a serious crime can't change but they could learn to control their impulses but they will always be there, I mean, not in all cases because someone who commited a serious crime in self-defense, they don't even have to learn to control because they don't have the intention/impulse to do it again; as for the forgiveness of society, this is fair to happen only if they already compulgated their sentence.
2.- When I say <em>blame</em>, it is not in all the extension of the word because when a person decides to cheat it's because the relationship he/she is in, it's over [love is gone, routine, unhappiness, etc...] and the two people inside that relationship let it happen, therefore I say the two are to blame although it's not a fault as such. And no one can be justified or pushed to cheat, everyone has the power on their own actions, so if someone cheats it's because they took that decision and the consequences of it.
3.- In a literary form it's in did nobler to die with integrity but that, in reality can hardly ever become true because in the world that we live in and in order to survive in this society, at some point we will have to compromised our principles and affect other people and learn to live with it.
4.- Because the worst enemy of people is fear, it was B.C. and A.F. and it will continue to be till the end of times because even though we have records of the consequences of irrationality, we don't care when we face the unknow, it's a simple survival instinct.
