Answer: PLEASE see below for answer
Explanation: An excludable good is referred to as a private good which restrict people from using them while a non excludable goods are public goods that do not place restriction an so people can access them eg park .
Also, Non-rivalrous goods are those goods that even though consumed by the people will not cause shortage of the availability of the same goods to others. A rivalrous good is the opposite as it causes shortage in availability to others when used.
National Defence----Non excludable and Non Rivalrous
Pay-Per-View cable television---Excludable and NonRivalrous
a Hot Pocket sandwich--- Excludable and Rivalrous
private classroom education--- Excludable and Rivalrous
pajamas--- Excludable and Rivalrous
a unicycle ---- Excludable and Rivalrous
Answer:
the answer is D.a bill board
Answer:
• Advertising undermines competition.
Explanation:
Oligopoly is a market structure which contains the small kind of firms in that it have non-significant influence. The concentration ratio defines the highest firms market share
As per the given options, the advertising impact the choice for the consumer in an oligopoly at the time when advertising undermines the competition
Therefore the option b is correct
And, the rest of the options are wrong
Answer:
covenant.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the type of deed that is in place is called a covenant. This term refers to any agreement that has been made in a written form such as a lease, deed, or other legal contract. Which is what HEH, Inc. has made with the written agreement stating that the lake cannot be touched.
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.
