Answer:
Par value of common stock is $2.5
Explanation:
The par value of common stock can determined by dividing the common stock total amount in each of the two years by the shares issued and outstanding in each year as demonstrated below:
2019:
Par value of common stock =Common stock($)/shares issued
common stock($) is $555 million
shares issued and outstanding is 222 million shares
par value of common stock=$555 million/222 million=$2.5
2020:
Par value of common stock =Common stock($)/shares issued
common stock($) is $560 million
shares issued and outstanding is 224 million shares
par value of common stock=$560 million/224 million=$2.5
Ultimately the par value of common stock as shown be computations for both years is $2.5
Answer: b
Explanation: i just did it on my test and got B
Answer:
1) The government prohibits gas stations from selling gasoline for more than $3.40 per gallon.
This statement is an example of price ceiling as the gas stations cannot raise their price above $3.40 but can sell it at any price lower than the ceiling price of $3.40. This is binding
2) Due to new regulations, gas stations that would like to pay better wages in order to hire more workers are prohibited from doing so. This is neither a price ceiling or floor as government isn't directly affecting the price with their policy
3) The government has instituted a legal minimum price of $3.40 per gallon for gasoline. This is an example of price floor and is binding. The reason it is a price floor is because the petrol stations cannot charge a price below $3.40 but can charge any price above the floor price of $3.40
Explanation:
Answer:
wages cannot adjust downward quickly and easily.
Explanation:
In a situation where the macroeconomy is experiencing a higher than the natural rate of unemployment, it must be because "wages cannot adjust downward quickly and easily."
Given that wages are arguably the most significant aspect to entice employees or people to work and get paid. Hence, where the wages are not enough to cause for the employees, there tends to be a situation where wages cannot adjust downward quickly and easily. And therefore, people would not want to work where there is low pay, and eventually, unemployment increases.
Answer:
c. Division 1 should continue to do business with Division 2 because Division 1's variable cost per part is only $18.
Explanation:
Since the variable cost per part is only $18 and Division 1 sells to Division 2 at $25, it is in the company's overall interest that business should continue between the two divisions.
The cost of getting the part from outside is $26. This will incur more cost to the company and create excess capacity for Division 1.
Fixed costs are not relevant in making a decision of this nature. The costs would be incurred irrespective of the decision made. They are therefore irrelevant. The relevant cost is the variable cost of $18 per unit. It should be the focus of the decision, including the possibility of excess capacity for Division 1.
