Answer:
cash generated from investing activites 9.1 millions
Explanation:
proceeds from investment 31 millions
proceeds from land 14.9 millions
purchase of equipment (24.9 millions)
purchase of patent (11.9 millions)
cash generated from investing activites 9.1 millions
The purcahse of treasury stock
and the sale of treasury stock (own common stock)
should be disclosure in the financing activities
The company uses the weighted-average method of process costing. At the beginning of the month, the forming department has 26,000 units in inventory, 70% complete as to materials and 30% complete as to conversion costs. ... Units completed in the forming department are transferred to the painting department.
The answer to the question is false
Waiting is a bad idea because you could lose good opportunities in the time you wait. Choosing the same career as someone you admire might not be what you would best enjoy or succeed in, and the job that earns you the most money isn't necessarily the most enjoyable. The answer is A :)
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
