1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hoochie [10]
2 years ago
11

Was the nation still divided after the civil war? claim

History
1 answer:
scZoUnD [109]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

During the Civil War, the country was divided between the North (Union States) and the South (Confederate States). The division began long before the onset of the war in 1861.

Explanation:

hope this helps!

You might be interested in
What are the positives and negatives of the zhou dynasty
Darina [25.2K]
Some of the positives of the Zhou Dynasty include that they had major religions and philosophies emerge from their era like Confucianism, Taoism and also Legalism. Also they had iron casting technology be improved.They also were the first dynasty that united China under a single government.Created the yin yang symbol, elaborately decorated tombs for the wealthy, bronze vases, cooking vessels, cups and household items.Some of the negatives of the Zhou Dynasty include that they were proved to be very weak rulers, when the feudal system collapsed they had no law system, and the lords were governing instead of the kings.
6 0
3 years ago
After the Industrial Revolution, most of the world's population moved from rural areas to urban ones. Explain why this took plac
matrenka [14]

Answer:

This took place because people moved to the urban areas in search of jobs that were avavailablealuble.

7 0
2 years ago
Discuss the benefits and problems of capitalism and s
Zigmanuir [339]

Capitalism is an economic system in which investments in an ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private  individuals or corporations specially as contrasted to cooperatively state-owned means of wealth. Socialism is a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

<h2>Why do people say that capitalism works better than socialism?</h2>

Capitalism and socialism have both been put to the test. Socialism never works; capitalism occasionally does. The outcomes are self-evident.

  • China. After the cultural revolution, the communist party seized power in China. They didn't have much financial success with anything. In its place, starvation claimed the lives of millions. Capitalist policies were put into place when Moa Zedong left office, and economic development suddenly skyrocketed.
  • US versus USSR The huge ideological conflict between capitalism and socialism was eventually the cause of the cold war. The sides began on land that was largely level. There is no doubt who won. The USA is currently the world's most powerful country by a wide margin. There is no longer a Soviet Union.
  • Almost all affluent countries, including the UK, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, and even the Nordic countries, have capitalist systems. All have different amounts of social expenditure, but this is only sustained by the underlying capitalism.
  • Cuba. Cubans are all equal, yet they are all equally impoverished. Nearly everyone in Cuba has it better than even those who are regarded as impoverished in prosperous countries like the USA.
  • Venezuela. elected a communist administration. They are currently in financial ruin. It would be difficult to locate a socialist administration that has made any effort to better the lives of its citizens. Although I would think there are none at all, perhaps I haven't looked closely enough.

In conclusion, a basic misunderstanding of human nature is the basis of socialism. When everyone actually ends up doing is trying to piggyback off of everyone else's hard work, it makes the false assumption that everyone is willing to labor selflessly for the benefit of the group. Although it is not a flawless system, capitalism at least provides a reward for effort. And when it comes down to it, hard effort is what improves our lives.

<h2>What are the pros and cons of socialism and capitalism?</h2>

Capitalism:

Pros ⇒ It is a method of voluntary trade. It is the best at allocating scarce resources. It has given people the highest quality of life in human history. Property rights, arbitrary assessments, and free will are all protected. It best manages self-interest. It rewards people who make the world a better place by making them rich. Static economic classes are eliminated by capitalism's dynamic character. Of course, there is more.

Cons ⇒ There isn't a spokesperson for free market capitalism. Market manipulation, monopolies, oligopolies, cronyism, fascism, inflation, central banking, fractional reserve banking, and any other financial news-related scheme are all confused with it.

Socialism:

Pro ⇒ Fair distribution of total generated wealth

Cons ⇒ It is oppressive. The loss of private property in the means of production prevents accurate economic calculations. Rare resources are squandered since there aren't genuine prices (actual prices reflect consumer values) (mountains of Soviet concrete). It does not satisfy the insatiable human drive for more (demand). denies possessing oneself. It establishes two static classes, one for workers and the other for politicians. Marx demanded that "undesirables" be removed from society (Irish, Scottish and non-whites).  

8 0
2 years ago
What was ironic about the 1804 crowning of Napolean Bonaparte?
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

Napolean crowned himself emperor.

Explanation:

Napolean Bonaparte's coronation in 1804 is ironic since he declared himself Emperor. Napoleon Bonaparte was France's first emperor and considered one of the country's finest military leaders. Napoleon was recognized as a military genius because he won several wars for France, allowing the country to expand. Despite his military background, Napolean crowned himself Emperor and declared that he would not be ruled by the Romans or submit to any force other than himself. As a result, the Crowning of 1804 is ironic because he crowned himself Emperor.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1848, how did society discourage a woman from taking a wage-earning job?
Tpy6a [65]
They were discouraged because the law at that time stated that their earning basically belonged to their spouse, and also they couldn't own property, so they couldn't use their money in any way other than giving it to their husband. With this kind of a law, nobody would work.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A belief in the need for a strong ruler, restrictive regulations, and harsh punishments was the foundation of the philosophy of
    10·1 answer
  • As a result of the presidency of Franklin d Roosevelt , the constitution was amended to
    15·2 answers
  • Which event in the 19th century England most benefited it's industrial economy?
    6·1 answer
  • In order to end the recession in the early 1990s, president Clinton<br>​
    14·1 answer
  • Was the united states justified in going to war with mexico mini-q answers
    5·1 answer
  • What country did the Renaissance begin in
    10·2 answers
  • Why might members of one political campaign want to spy or steal information from another campaign?
    13·1 answer
  • How did Enlightenment ideas about liberty, natural rights, and human dignity apply to most of the world’s people in the eighteen
    14·2 answers
  • TRUE OR FALSE- PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY <br><br> Were Native Americans well treated on Mexican Ranchos?
    6·1 answer
  • Choose the best word in the drop-down menu to complete the sentences.
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!