Your answer is :
catamarans.
compasses.
mapmaking.
hope this helped you
1. Americans felt the need to move west because they wanted to control the west part. 2. They also moved because they wanted cheap land to pay for.
The
Scarlet Letter shows readers the lives of a Puritan community in the 17th
century. Religion (blind religion) meant everything to them, and the words of
their Reverends was law. Breaking any religious rules was punished by public
humiliation and punishment of the person who committed it, for example, Hester
Prynne. When the church found out that she was committing adultery, they forced
her to wear a scarlet letter 'A' on her chest, so that her sin could follow her
everywhere and she (and others in the community), could be constantly reminded
of it. <span>
<span>This kind of belief in punishing supposed "sinners"
made relationships between men and women in this Puritan community very
strained. Religion governed their way of life. They failed to realize that no
human is perfect, and no human can precisely follow that kind of a lifestyle.
In the end, when the reader finds out who the man was that Hester had committed
adultery with, it is obvious what Hawthorne was trying to communicate about
such strict organized religion; no one is as perfect as God, therefore looking
up to reverends and priests in such a blind belief is dangerous because they
are only human and make similar mistakes as everyone else.</span></span>
Answer
Hi,
If the opportunity cost of producing a particular good is lower for one producer than another, the former producer has comparative advantage for producing the good.
Explanation
A comparative advantage occurs when a producer is able to produce goods by using fewer resources at a lower opportunity cost. Increasing the production of one good will mean that less goods for another can be produced. This theory is advantageous in free trade because a producer can be able to realize higher output gains by selling goods in which he or she enjoys comparative advantage.
Best wishes!
Supporters of the youthful dissidents saluted the Court choice that "understudies are qualified for opportunity of articulation of their
sees." Critics who contradicted the wearing of the armbands anticipated hurtful outcomes.
Equity Hugo Black disagreed from the dominant part assessment. He recommended that the Court's choice was "the start of a
new progressive time of tolerance in this nation encouraged by the legal." He contended that nobody has a total
appropriate to the right to speak freely and articulation.
Later choices, for example,
Bethel School District
v.
Fraser
(1986) and
Hazelwood School District
v.
Kuhlmeier
(1988),
limited
understudies' First Amendment rights. These
decisions by their inclination likewise extended the specialist of school authorities.
