The following is missing for the question to be complete:
A. Utilitarianism
B. Social responsibility
C. Consumerism
D. Preconventional morality
E. Distributive justice
Answer: A. Utilitarianism
Explanation: Utilitarianism is the doctrine according to which any procedure, rule, action, is good and useful if it suits the majority. According to this doctrine, the happiness and satisfaction of the majority should be the guide to which rules and norms should be harmonised. So, from the point of view of this doctrine, it is morally wrong to deprive most people of a popular student restaurant. It would be moral to meet the needs of the majority, to make the majority happy, and so the student restaurant would have usefulness, that is utility, hence the name of this doctrine. So the moral decision of what is good and what is wrong is made based on the outcome of the action or decision, and the outcome is good if it satisfies the majority.
1. Be more assertive
2. Stop asking for permission from others/make your own decisions
3. Get to know yourself
True I believe. Children often tattle!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can answer the following.
Nozick’s Wilt Chamberlain example (updated by Professor Sandel to the Michael Jordan example) is supposed to illustrate that "liberty upsets patterns and, therefore, the entitlement conception of justice requires illegitimate restrictions of liberty. This applies to justice in holdings and justice in transfer.
American professor Robert Nozick, known for its interesting work at Harvard University, was a justice researcher and theorist who studied libertarian rights and the role of justice in modern society.
In 1974, he wrote the influential book called "Anarchy, State and Utopia," in which he defended the existence of a non-interventional state that granted liberties to citizens with minimal or none interference in the lives of people.
