Answer:In short, the British treated their colonies in vastly different ways, both across different regions and within the same colonies over time.
The British Empire was never a consistent empire. Across various colonies, there were different raisons d’être and methods of organization for each one. Even within America, different Colonies were founded for entirely different reasons. Virginia started out as a mercantile colony run by a company; Massachusetts was originally a Puritan theocracy; New York was a crown colony taken over from the Dutch; and Maryland and Pennsylvania were religiously tolerant colonies governed by (relatively) benign hereditary feudal rulers (called proprietors), the Barons Calvert and the Penn family. South Carolina, with its rice and indigo plantations, was more akin to a Caribbean colony than its continental neighbors.* At the same time that the American Colonies were emerging, the East India Company established outposts in India, and the Royal African Company did much the same in Africa. None of them were uniformly governed or similar in character; the British government occasionally took notice but generally was not involved in their governance.
Explanation: hi ;0
Because of the compromises delegates reached, the work of the Constitutional Convention "<span>4.strengthened the central government". It gave the central (federal) government the power to tax the states and to have economic dominance over the states. </span>
D. the Mexican Cession, through the Mexican-American War
hope this helped
Answer:
1. b) The 14th amendment enabled the government to reinterpret the purpose and usage of the Bill of Rights.
2. c) The Supreme Court used incorporation because states were violating the Bill of Rights.
3. b) Incorporation binds states to the Bill of Rights rather than the Federal Government.
4. c) "When the 14th Amendment was ratified...., it placed limits on the kinds of laws states could pass"
5. d) The incorporation of the 14th amendment may not benefit all Americans equally.
Explanation:
- The Supreme Court has only adopted certain Bill of Rights modifications. They haven't protected all rights against governmental intrusion, so they're not done. C explains the Supreme Court's incorporation, so it's the most correct. The Supreme Court successfully utilized incorporation to stop state Bill of Rights violations.
- In general, incorporation has had a positive impact on American civil rights. As a result, it has ensured that both state and federal governments are held to the same standard in protecting the rights of individuals.
- State and municipal governments were compelled to defend "most liberties included in the Bill of Rights" under the 14th Amendment, which was originally intended for recently freed slaves. There was no need that states comply by the constraints it put on the federal government, as stated above. All of this is accurate. There was a Supreme Court decision that had a major influence on our federalist system that is referenced in this quotation about incorporation. A state's power is limited when it comes to federally protected rights when it comes to enacting an unlawful legislation.
•Madison often said
->most of the new nation's political problems grew out of such commercial problems
•the money system,
->there was no national money
-->Federal Debt + Power <--
