Answer:
<h2>33</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the average low temperature by month in Nashville is represented by the function f(x)=-1.4x² + 19x +1.7, where x is the month, the average rate of change is expressed as d[f(x)]/dx = 2(1.4x) + 19
d[f(x)]/dx = 2.8x + 19
Since the number of months between March and August is 5 months and x is in months, hence we will substitute x = 5 into the resulting function to get the average rate of change from March to August as shown;
d[f(x)]/dx at x = 5
= 2.8(5)+ 19
= 14 + 19
= 33
<em>Hence the average rate of change from March to August is 33</em>
Using PEMDAS, we know that we must solve what’s in the perentheses first so: 25/5 + 7 - (4x3) = 25/5 + 7-12. Next, we simplify 25/5 because that is division so now it is 5+7-12. Now you add 7 to 5 to get 12 and then subtract 12 so your answer is now zero.
Answer: 275$
I'm not entirely sure I did this right! But at least try!!!
Step-by-step explanation:
20/100 = 55/x (cross multiply)
20x = 5,500 (divide)
X = 275
Based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What is congruency?</h3>
The Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem (SAS) defines two triangles to be congruent to each other if the included angle and two sides of one is congruent to the included angle and corresponding two sides of the other triangle.
An included angle is found between two sides that are under consideration.
See image attached below that demonstrates two triangles that are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem.
Thus, two triangles having two pairs of corresponding sides and one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent to each other is not enough justification for proving that the two triangles are congruent based on the SAS Congruence Theorem.
The one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent MUST be "INCLUDED ANGLES".
Therefore, based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
Learn more about congruency at
brainly.com/question/14418374
#SPJ1
