Answer:
Alliances were an important feature of the international system on the eve of World War I. The formation of rival blocs of Great Powers has previously considered a major cause of the outbreak of war in 1914. The alliances system meant that a local conflict could easily result into an intimidating global one. Nationalism was a great cause of World War one because of countries being greedy and not negotiating.
Explanation:
It is not sure if Ibn al-Athir was of Arab or Curdish ethnicity, but it is agreed that he was one of the main writers and biographers of the Crusades Era, and one of the Great Historians of the Muslim World.
He was born in the Great Seljuq Empire, modern Turkey, and experienced all the wars and chaos brought by Franks in the Crusades, living in Mosul, Baghdad and Damascus, even travelling with Saladin through for a period.
So, despite for being one of the only authors of its time to show respect and admiration for some of the Frank´s qualities, his main work "The Complete History" (Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh"), that aims at telling his history of the world, has obvious bias in favour of the Muslim cause.
Which can be observed in his accounts of the death of the Christian ruler of Tyre, in a way that could not be written by modern historians:
"In this year, on 13 rabi II, the Frankish Marquis, the ruler of Tyre-- God [email protected] him!-- was killed. He was the greatest devil of all the Franks."
The power is concurrent power, examples of concurrent power would be the power to tax citizens, create lower courts, and build roads. These are shared by the federal and state/local government to ensure that the state functions properly.
<span>In my point of view if a group of people pillaged a town,they took valuable items from the town.Because if they are good minded people they will ask help from other villagers there is no need to pillage the town.If they are evil minded and more dangerous they decided to settle in the town.</span>
