Question

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST URGENT

Answer 1

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The answer is  

C) No; the case is moot since the law was repealed.

Answer 2

Answer:

Explanation:

Akbar definitely has standing as he is affected by the tax law. State laws are challengeable in federal courts if they affect interstate trade. There is a federal interest here as the state laws affect the interstate trade of ice cream.

However the reason the federal courts would NOT review this case is because the case is moot since the law was repealed.

The answer is C).