1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRISSAK [1]
3 years ago
15

não sei pq esse povo velho fica aoagando a resposta da pessoa a pessoa tem i mo trabalho ora reaponde e o que adianta (・ิω・ิ)ノ​

Social Studies
1 answer:
Svetllana [295]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

hablo engles?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP!!
Fofino [41]

Answer: d. Neither the researchers nor the experimental subjects know whether the latter have been assigned to an experimental group or a control  group.

Explanation:

A Double-blind design refers to a kind of experimental procedure aimed to reduce the possibility of any subjective biases on both the researchers and the participants. Mostly used in medical trials of drugs, double-blind experiments have participants randomly selected to be part of either the control or the experimental group. There´s a third party in charge of providing the random selection and encoding the information until the data collection is completed.

4 0
3 years ago
What year was the brown v board of education
garik1379 [7]

Answer:

May 17, 1954

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
In a paragraph of 4-7 sentences, explain the Great Compromise as if you were one of the patriots there in that time.
lions [1.4K]

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

6 0
3 years ago
In most states, the winner of the popular vote ___________________.
Virty [35]
I believe the answer to you question is...
Gets most of the electoral votes

Hope this helps friend
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Alexander Hamilton want to pay off the nation’s debt?
jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

George Washington chose the talented Alexander Hamilton, who had served ... To raise money to pay off the debts, Hamilton would issue new securities bonds). ... a central bank would help make the new nation's economy dynamic through a ... Rather than accept this condition, Hamilton wanted the United States to adopt a ...

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were 4 effects on the transcontinental railroad and 1 cause of it
    15·1 answer
  • According to howard, barrett, and frick (2010), in order to make appropriate choices educators must understand the ways in which
    7·1 answer
  • Peopleparticipation reducethe cost of the project and make best use of available resource.​
    9·1 answer
  • Maraming pangyayari sa ating kasaysayan na nakakaapekto sa pag-iisip,
    9·1 answer
  • Is Canada a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers? Should Canada continue to support peacekeeping or should we abandon it?
    12·1 answer
  • This isss the last questionnn
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement illustrates the system of checks and balances at work?
    15·2 answers
  • In this type of government political and governmental power is held by the citizens of the country
    10·1 answer
  • How I can contribute my unrecognized country education research?​
    13·1 answer
  • What does the word allies mean in the phrase “with few Algonquian allies in the area to trade with”?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!