1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Juliette [100K]
2 years ago
9

Please i need this quick

History
1 answer:
rodikova [14]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH ALONE:the sinner is justified by faith alone, meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate in order to obtain the grace of justification, and that it is not in any way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the action of his own will (canon 9);

EXCOMMUNICATION:the action of officially excluding someone from participation in the sacraments and services of the Christian Church.

HERESY:belief or opinion contrary to orthodox religious (especially Christian) doctrine.

You might be interested in
Explain two factors that could motivate a nation to carry out genocide
kondaur [170]
Fear
Gain
Deference of authority
3 0
3 years ago
¿Crees que si la mayor parte de los humanos, cambiamos nuestros malos hábitos con el medio ambiente, las grandes corporaciones s
anygoal [31]

Answer:

si

Explanation:

porque ya no tendrian excusa

5 0
2 years ago
What was the BIG ISSUE in the Dred Scott case?
Mrac [35]
Basically, if Dredd Scott would be free,or still be his masters property.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the gentleman’s agreement
PtichkaEL [24]

A gentlemen's agreement or gentleman's agreement is an informal and legally non-binding agreement between two or more parties. It is typically oral, though it may be written, or simply understood as part of an unspoken agreement by convention or through mutually beneficial etiquette. The essence of a gentlemen's agreement is that it relies upon the honor of the parties for its fulfillment, rather than being in any way enforceable. It is, therefore, distinct from a legal agreement or contract, which can be enforced if necessary

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hector Diaz is unhappy with the decision the trial court made, so he appealed his case to a higher court. In this example Hector
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

In this example Hector is the appellant

Explanation:

An appellant is a person who is not happy or satisfied with the decision of a lower court and hence he/she appeals to the higher court for looking into the decision taken by the lower court with an expectation of reversing the decision of the lower court.

Since, Hector is also appealing to the higher court with an expectation of reversing the decision of the lower court, he will be known as an appellant

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Eileen Gray experimented with geometric forms and industrially produced materials. Why did Eileen Gray originally design her fam
    8·2 answers
  • Why did Andrew Jackson not pursue the annexation of Texas?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of Stalin's actions?
    14·1 answer
  • How did Otto von Bismarck get control as chancellor
    6·1 answer
  • Which book was responsible for promoting the investigation illustrated in this cartoon
    9·2 answers
  • What was the effect of the stock market crash in 1929?
    14·2 answers
  • Is there a desert in Spain?
    9·2 answers
  • I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST
    7·1 answer
  • The korean war began when north korean forces crossed the yangtze river
    8·2 answers
  • what was the impact of pseudoscientific ideas of race on the jewish nation by the nazi germany during the period 1933 to 1946? n
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!