1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Schach [20]
3 years ago
15

1. The Romans believed that all their wars were just wars." Do you think they were? Do you think

History
1 answer:
Rudik [331]3 years ago
3 0

Explanation:

The just war theory is a largely Christian philosophy that attempts to reconcile three things:

taking human life is seriously wrong

states have a duty to defend their citizens, and defend justice

protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values sometimes requires willingness to use force and violence

The theory specifies conditions for judging if it is just to go to war, and conditions for how the war should be fought.

Although it was extensively developed by Christian theologians, it can be used by people of every faith and none.

Purpose

The aim of Just War Theory is to provide a guide to the right way for states to act in potential conflict situations. It only applies to states, and not to individuals (although an individual can use the theory to help them decide whether it is morally right to take part in a particular war).

Just War Theory provides a useful framework for individuals and political groups to use for their discussions of possible wars.

The theory is not intended to justify wars but to prevent them, by showing that going to war except in certain limited circumstances is wrong, and thus motivate states to find other ways of resolving conflicts.

'Just', or merely 'permissible'?

The doctrine of the Just War can deceive a person into thinking that because a war is just, it's actually a good thing.

But behind contemporary war theory lies the idea that war is always bad. A just war is permissible because it's a lesser evil, but it's still an evil.

Origins

The principles of a Just War originated with classical Greek and Roman philosophers like Plato and Cicero and were added to by Christian theologians like Augustine and Thomas Aquinas.

Elements

There are two parts to Just War theory, both with Latin names:

Jus ad bellum: the conditions under which the use of military force is justified.

Jus in bello: how to conduct a war in an ethical manner.

A war is only a Just War if it is both justified, and carried out in the right way. Some wars fought for noble causes have been rendered unjust because of the way in which they were fought.

You might be interested in
How do you think the culture and values shared by Greeks both united and divided them
ratelena [41]
It divided them because the Greek city states were all proud of their own culture, traditions and heritage. This led to many internal conflicts and struggles. At the same time, however, in times of need when there was a strong outside force (Persian empire for example), they joined together as their culture and values bonded them together to fight a common enemy.
3 0
4 years ago
How did the Freedom Rides differ from the Freedom Summer?
andriy [413]
The Freedom Rides differ from the Freedom Summer by Freedom Rides were aimed at ending segregation. The Freedom Summer on the hand was aimed at expanding voting rights.

The answer would be the letter D or the fourth sentence choice.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer and ill mark you BRAINLIEST<br> The Amendment process- describe the steps
Serhud [2]

Step 1. Passage by Congress. Proposed amendment language must be approved by a two-thirds vote of both houses.

Step 2. Notification of the states. The national archivist sends notification and materials to the governor of each state.

Step 3. Ratification by three-fourths of the states. Ratification of the amendment language adopted by Congress is an up-or-down vote in each legislative chamber. A state legislature cannot change the language. If it does, its ratification is invalid. A governor’s signature on the ratification bill or resolution is not necessary.

Step 4. Tracking state actions. Proposed amendments must be ratified by three-fourths of the states in order to take effect. Congress may set a time limit for state action. The official count is kept by Office of the Federal Register at the National Archives. Legislatures must return specific materials to show proof of ratification.

Step 5. Announcement. When the requisite number of states ratify a proposed amendment, the archivist of the United States proclaims it as a new amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Actual certification is published immediately in the Federal Register and eventually in the United States Statutes-at-Large.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which American president signed the North American Free Trade Agreement?
Fantom [35]
Bill Clinton is the answer :)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following would be another way to describe the Seneca Falls Convention?
trapecia [35]

Answer:  The site of the first women's rights convention in history.

The national meeting in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848, was the first women's rights convention to be held in the United States, and was organized by women.  Elizabeth Cady Stanton was one of the principal organizers of the gathering, and also was the lead author of an important document issued by what we now call the "Seneca Falls Convention."  The <em>Declaration of Sentiments</em> was signed by 68 women and 32 men who had been among the participants in the convention. The document was modeled after Thomas Jefferson's <em>Declaration of Independence.</em>  In the way that Jefferson had listed grievances against the British monarchy, the <em>Declaration of Sentiments</em> listed grievances against how man had oppressed woman in regard to civil rights.  Here's a small sample of some of the "sentiments" which were expressed:

<em>The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world:</em>

  • <em>He has not ever permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise.</em>
  • <em>He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice.</em>
  • <em>He has withheld her from rights which are given to the most ignorant and degraded men—both natives and foreigners.</em>
  • <em>Having deprived her of this first right as a citizen, the elective franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of legislation, he has oppressed her on all sides.</em>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do citizens have to register to vote? A.) To become part of the census B.) To know where people live C.) To study of people
    5·2 answers
  • Which group is most likely to use terrorism to achieve its goals?
    14·2 answers
  • 3. Which of the following should you do if your accelerator is stuck?
    14·2 answers
  • "The shelter pictured in this handbook was designed to help Americans survive
    10·1 answer
  • Social standing in the puritan church was largely dependent on
    7·2 answers
  • In 1792 bc, hammurabi become babylon’s most powerful monarch. about how long ago was that?
    12·2 answers
  • As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, courts can require states to
    7·2 answers
  • As a result of French and Indian War
    9·2 answers
  • Which North Carolina general surrendered to the Union at the end of the Civil War?
    10·1 answer
  • Compare the Progressive of the early 1900's to the Progressives
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!