1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
user100 [1]
3 years ago
13

Evaluate intergral 10xe exponent 10x dx​

Mathematics
2 answers:
Aleks [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

((10x-1)e^(10x))/10 + C

Step-by-step explanation:

10 integral (xe^(10x)) dx

Integrate by parts f=x f'=1 / g'=e^(10x) g= (e^(10x))/10

(xe^(10x)/10) - integral (e^(10x)/10) dx

Solving integral (e^(10x)/10) dx :

1/100 integral (e^u) du

= e^u/1000 = e^(10x)/100

(xe^(10x)/10)-(e^(10x)/100)

10 integral (xe^(10x)) dx

= xe^(10x)- (e^(10x))/10

= xe^10x - (e^(10x))/10 + C

= ((10x-1)e^(10x))/10 + C

Shtirlitz [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

for this type of question, integral by parts should be used . This involves using the formula for intregation by parts:

intudv=uv-intvdu.  

lets first break apart the x and e10x into two parts - "u" and "v"

where u = x.

however, we need to find the value of v. in order to do this, we can integrate dv/dx in order to get to v.  

the value of dv/dx is : e10x

 

u = x             dv/dx = e10x

 

as seen in the formula, you need to have a value for u, dv, v and du.  

therefore in order to get du you must differentiate u:

u = x    

du/dx = 1

du = 1dx = dx

du = dx

 

in order to get v you need to integrate dv/dx:

\displaystyle \inte10x dx = 1/10 x10x

now that we have both parts, we can put this back into the formula.  

 

intudv=uv-intvdu.  

 

\displaystyle \intxe10x = x * 1/10e10x  - \displaystyle \int1/10e10x dx

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Which statements are correct for all values of x?
MissTica

Answer:

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

3(2x + 1)=6x + 3

3*2x=6x, 3*1 = 3

so therefore 3(2x+1)=6x + 3

7 0
3 years ago
Ben is spending his summer driving across the country. He is going to spend the first day
KengaRu [80]

Answer:

The graph of the data presented is shown in the attached image to this solution.

It shows that the relationship between distance travelled in miles and the time take in hours is D = 55t

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance travelled with the corresponding time taken are presented in the table

Note: D - Distance travelled (miles)

t - Time (hours)

D | t

55 | 1

110 | 2

165 | 3

220 | 4

275 | 5

330 | 6

We are then told to plot these distance travelled on a graph with the time taken.

The distance travelled is plotted on the y-axis and the time in hours is plotted on the x-axis.

The image of the graph of this function will be attached to this answer

It is evident that the graph shows the relationship between the distance travelled and time taken to be D = 55t

Hope this Helps!!!

4 0
3 years ago
We are 95% confident that the population proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the
alex41 [277]

Answer:

What do Americans think about preferential hiring of women? Has there been a change in the past decade? In 2000(group 1) and 2010(Group 2), the General Social Survey asked participants if they would favor or oppose preferential hiring of women. In 2000, out of 849 respondents, 271 said yes. In 2010, out of 696 respondents, 225 said yes. The 95% confidence interval for p1-p2 is (-0.0509, 0.04273). What would be an appropriate conclusion? O We are 95% confident that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2000 is 0.04723. We are 95% confident that the pulation proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2010 is 0.04723. We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2000. O We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2010.

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me solve for this ASAP
Olenka [21]

Answer:

Im in college and don't rember this at all.

6 0
3 years ago
How do i calculate this? PV = 100,000(1+0.03)
meriva

Answer:

  103,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Use your knowledge of decimal arithmetic. Or, use a calculator.

  100,000(1 +.03) = 100,000·1.03 = 1000·103 = 103,000

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The logistic equation below can be used to model population growth. In the equation, P is population, t is time, and e = 2.72.
    9·1 answer
  • An art gallery has eight new paintings, all the same size, but enough room on the wall for six of them. How many ways can the di
    9·2 answers
  • In folding to make a 6-sided snowflake, what shape do you have after completing the first 5 steps?
    7·1 answer
  • A certain store sells only black shoes and brown shoes. In a certain week, the store sold x black shoes and y brown shoes. If 2/
    5·1 answer
  • Need help with this question
    5·1 answer
  • Explain your answer thank you!!​
    10·2 answers
  • 1. Write the question y=-1/2x+3 in standard form.
    5·1 answer
  • A direct variation function contains the points (–8, –6) and (12, 9). Which equation represents the function?
    10·2 answers
  • Which sentence can reperesent the inequality 3.5x>7?
    5·2 answers
  • Find the area of the circle. Round your answer to the nearest hundredth. Use. 3.14 or 22/7 for pi. 10 inch
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!