It's the sort of a line drawn on most of the maps. It can be between countries, cities-- almost anything that is not natural.
Answer;
<span>Samuel Adams and Thomas Jefferson are alike in their position on ratifying the Constitution in that;
</span><span>-They both opposed a strong federal government.
Explanation;
Sam Adams helped formulate resistance to the Stamp Act and played a vital role in organizing the Boston Tea Party. Sam Adams opposed a strong federal government,
Thomas Jefferson </span>regarded the people as the ultimate defenders of liberty. Distrust of power, especially power concentrated in a central government, was central to his political views. <span>Among the constitutional measures which he supported in order to avoid concentration of power were federalism and the separation of powers</span>
The main change between the Qin and Han governments was the shift from harsh Legalism to the more lenient and filial piety oriented Confucianism.
The primary reason why it was important for the Americans to win the support of France during the revolution was because they needed their money to fight the much larger British army. This money was paid back in the years following the war.
<u>Here are your matches:</u>
John Locke = philosopher
Boston Tea Party = British reacted with Intolerable Acts
Sugar and Molasses Act = tax reduced after boycotts
Navigation Acts = required colonies to trade only with England
Saratoga = turning point of the Revolution
Quartering Act = required colonists to house troops
George Rogers Clark = captured western British forts
Proclamation of 1763 = forbade settlement beyond Alleghenies
Iroquois = British allies in the Revolution
French and Indian War = British obtained Canada
Permit me to say a bit more about John Locke, the philosopher -- as important background to the American Revolution.
The American founding fathers read Locke (as well as other Enlightenment writers). The American Revolution (1775-1783) was inspired by ideas such as those of Locke. John Locke (1632-1704) argued for the idea of a "social contract." According to his view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his<em> First Treatise on Civil Government.</em> In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government, </em>Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property.
