The answer is: [B]: "False" .
__________________________________________________
Based on the description, <span> this is an example of: Stimulus generalization
</span>Stimulus generalization happens if people start to develop a tendency to react if they're exposed to a certain stimulus, no matter what the context is.
In this case, the green light served as a stimulus for the driver before he decided to do the actions
the answer should be: The study's construct validity
A study's construct validity refers to the degree to which the experiments made in the study actually measures what it intended to measure. This can be seen on the study's standard of measurement and the correlation between variables used in the measurement and the actual phenomenon.
After hearing the claimed made by the teacher, Clarissa's immediately question whether the act of bullying can be measured.
She brought up an important point. The teacher never really specify what act considered as 'bullying'. Depending on people's perception, some consider a slight discomfort from social interaction might be considered as bullying, while other people might have the threshold. Because of this, she can say that the study's construct validity is questionable.
Answer:
A change in the meaning of an unambiguous provision in the contract
Explanation:
The main aim of the pleading the parol evidence rule is to ensure that a party is prevented from any introduction of evidence of oral agreements made before the contract was agreed or in the process of reducing the agreement to its final form for the purpose of altering the existing terms in the current contract. Hence Weaver pleading the parol evidence rule ensures that Ward does not introduce parol evidence as long as it relates to a change in any of the provisions in the contract.
fighting for the country is saving it. or they want to make sure there family can be as safe as possible and that's how they do it. :) plz make me brainlyist
