Individual patterns of power can often be traced to how one was raised, their culture and their values. Power varies between each person and their need for it can change as well. Not all people have a need for power but the patterns of what one needs and how they are going to get it change depending on how they were raised. Since we all have different values, power is often a value that is important to one but maybe not to another.
The infant- toddler teachers helps in providing opportunities for infants and toddlers to reach for, grasp, and handle objects.
<h3>What is learning process ?</h3>
Learning process involves the passage of knowledge from one the teacher to the students.
When teaching little children, using visual
object is necessary, so they can grab what they are been taught easily.
Learn more about learning process at:
brainly.com/question/25567167
Answer:
This study is a demonstration of "Predictive validity".
Explanation:
Predictive validity involves testing a certain metric and then determining the extent to which the result of that test predicts future behavior.
In this case, the research indicates that those people who made eye contact during an interview conducted at an earlier date, ended up scoring high on a new test that measured self esteem. On the other hand, those who avoided eye contact scored low.
Therefore it infers that, making eye contact is a predictor of high self esteem and avoiding eye contact is a predictor of low self esteem.
Answer:
He found that as the study progressed, the participants' estimates began to converge with each other.
Explanation:
Sherif's study, conducted in 1936, showed a deep level of conformity in participants, known as internalization. Sherif asked participants to observe a point of light and estimate how much it moved - the point never really moved. <u>When isolated, participants had their own estimates. However, when placed in groups, they would change their estimates to conform to what the group seemed to believe. Not only were they agreeing publicly, but also privately, since the group's estimate persisted even when participants were separated again.</u> Therefore, <u>we can see that, as the study progressed, participants' estimates began to converge with each other as a result of internalization.</u>