They should ideally be the same. However, the difference is that the theoretical probability is what is expected to happen while the experimental probability is what happens in the actual scenario. The computation for both would be the same, and they should ideally be the same, unless other factors in an experiment would confound it.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A large company issues <em>common</em> stock, the company selling the stock often distributes profits by issuing <em>dividends</em> to its shareholders.
I uploaded the answer to a file hosting. Here's link:
bit.
ly/3a8Nt8n
To answer this question, we need to know what absolute value is in the first place. <u><em>ANSWERS ARE AT THE BOTTOM.</em></u>
Absolute value represents how far something is from 0 in a number line.
For example, lets take 4.
4 is 4 units away from 0 on the number line, so the absolute value of 4 is 4.
Now lets look at another example, -4. -4 is also 4 units away from 0, just in the other direction. However, when calculating absolute value, we do not care about the direction. Therfore, the absolute value of -4 is also 4.
Now let's look at your problem.
You want the <em>absolute value</em> of 0 and -4/5
<u><em>Following the same principle above about the distance from 0, here are your answers:</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em>Absolute value of 0</em></u><u><em>: </em></u><em>0</em>
<em></em>
<u><em>Absolute value of -4/5</em></u><u><em>: </em></u><em>4/5</em>
We do as follows:
let x = amount of 45% solution
y = amount of 30% solution
overall balance => x + y = 450
acid balance => .45x + .30y = .40(450)
Solving simultaneously, we will have:
x = 300 mL
y = 150 mL
This is assuming that partial molar properties does not affect the volume greatly. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.