Answer:
1) The students in class could see the dark clouds <u><em>through the window.</em></u> (Answers the question of "where")
2)<u><em> For a minute and a half</em></u>, the alarm bell was ringing. (Answers the question of "how much")
3) Javier’s uncle lifts weights <u><em>every single morning</em></u>. (Answers the question of "when")
Answer:
sorry but Im so creative that I gave a lot of words. You can pick some points from my answer.
Explanation:
If there is such a thing as karma in the world of fiction, Rainsford definitely begins to experience it as he comes to understand what it means to be the hunted instead of the hunter. When Rainsford falls off his yacht and has to swim to Ship Trap Island, he engages in a deadly game with General Zaroff, the owner of the island. Zaroff, too, is a hunter, and he wants the ultimate prize, a human kill. Throughout the story, Rainsford and Zaroff square off in a “survival of the fittest” death match to see who is the most powerful. The two men engage in a cat and mouse game, and Rainsford symbolically becomes an animal who has to use all of his instincts to survive. At the end of the story, Rainsford confronts Zaroff in his bedroom. The hunted, Rainsford, has now cornered the hunter, Zaroff. They have a sword duel, and Rainsford kills Zaroff and sleeps in Zaroff’s bed that night.
I’m not so sure Rainsford learns or changes much by the end of the story. There isn’t any epiphany at the end where Rainsford vows he will never hunt again. The ending is ambiguous in its meaning. Does Rainsford enjoy killing Zaroff and now have killing humans “in his blood”? Or, does he learn a lesson about killing innocent animals because he finally understands what it feels like to be tracked and hunted? It’s up to the reader to decide because the author, Richard Connell, really leaves it up in the air for the reader to analyze. Perhaps Rainsford’s karma is yet to be realized.
The theme of William Shakespeare's Sonnet 73 is the importance of the friend of the poet's loving him more strongly because of the temporal state of life. Calling attention to his aging in order to convince his lover of the urgency of full affection, the poet uses images such as "yellow leaves" and "twilight."
The substitution of the name of an attribute or adjunct for that of the thing meant, for example, suit for<span> </span>the business executive<span>, or </span>the track<span> for </span>horse racing<span>.
</span>
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
A few minutes later, Luma arrived. Members of the Under Fifteens and Seventeens were warming up when she walked onto the field past Fornatee, without making eye contact. Luma blew her whistle and told the two teams to gather at opposite ends of the field.
"She's more than a coach—that's why," Fornatee said, almost to himself. "She's a great person. I'm going to go over there and tell her, 'That's my team.'"
Fornatee hesitated. I asked him if he was nervous about talking to Coach. He laughed anxiously, then composed himself.
"Nah—I'm not nervous," he said.
What conclusion can be drawn about this scene based on the narrator's decision to write in the first-person point of view?
Answer:
The narrator experienced this event in person.
Explanation:
The narration that uses the point of view in first person is a narration made by a character of the plot telling what he witnessed and the experiences he lived in a certain moment of his life. That way we learn about the events that occur in the narrative through the character's perspective, what he saw and what he felt.
In this case, we can say that when the narrator used the point of view in the first person, he wanted to show that he lived this experience in person.
