For the answer to the questions above, I think the most significant thing is probably manpower. The Romans had the pool of hundreds of thousands of small farmers to draw upon. The Carthaginians used mainly mercenaries and federate.<span>The Roman Govt also seems to have taken the war more seriously, as a 'total war', and mobilized all their resources earlier and more effectively. Combined with their larger manpower this meant they were able to absorb defeats more easily and continue fighting. I have read a book which used the analogy of a disciplined roman 'communist' society fighting a disinterested Carthaginian 'capitalist' society. Romans have a strong government system which is so organized and amazing how they developed that advance system that time
</span>I hope my answer helped you.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer:
Social Class
Explanation:
Social class is a group of people in a society that has common political, economic, or cultural status.
The statement "Transnational organized crime is a conspiratorial activity, involving the coordination of numerous people" is true.
<h3>What is Transnational organized crime?</h3>
Transnational organized crime can be defined as the type of crime in which different people that lived in different state or country plan to venture into business that are illegal.
This group of people execute their plan after planning it by commiting different altrocities or by involving in different criminal acts.
Therefore the statement is true.
Learn more about Transnational organized crime here:brainly.com/question/3661630
Answer: critic
Explanation:
A critic is a professional who communicates an opinion and an assessment of various forms of creative works such as music, art, cinema, literature, theatre, architecture, fashion and food. Critics may also take as their government policy it subject social.
