Answer:
a) Linear
b) Linear
c) Linear
d) Neither
See explanation below.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) 
For this case the differential equation have the following general form:

Where
and
and since n>1 we can see that is a linear differential equation.
b) 
We can rewrite the following equation on this way:

For this case the differential equation have the following general form:

Where
and
and since n=0 we can see that is a linear differential equation.
c) 
For this case we can write the differential equation on this way:

For this case the differential equation have the following general form:

Where
and
and since n=0 we can see that is a linear differential equation.
d) 
For this case we can't express the differential equation in terms:

So the is not linear, and since we can separate the variables in order to integrate is not separable. So then the answer for this one is neither.
Answer:
3
- 48
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
(a + 2)(3a² + 12)(a - 2)
= (a + 2)(a - 2)(3a² + 12) ← expand the first pair of parenthesis using FOIL
=(a² - 4)(3a² + 12) ← expand using FOIL
= 3
+ 12a² - 12a² - 48 ← collect like terms
= 3
- 48
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Given numbers:</u>
<u>Given equation:</u>
<u>Solve:</u>
Volume is 105 in³.
Factor 196k
196k=2*2*7*7*k
we need to get something like x^3
hmm
we right now have
(2*7)^2
if we multiply that by (2*7)^1, we can beg (2*7)^3,
therefor k=2*7=14
tha tnumber is 14
or
if k can be any number
k can be 1/196, to make it 1, and 1 is a perfect cube
or
my bro had an epic idea: what if k is negative
the cube root of a negative number is negative
so the smallest one would be negative infinity or something
I think the answer you're looking for is k=14
Answer: 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the denominator of the two fractions are already the same, we do not have to alter the fractions at all
Because the denominators are the same, all we have to worry about is the numerator, so take 67 and subtract 43 from it to get 24

As you know, 24/8 = 3, and that would be your final answer