Answer:
Sunk-cost fallacy.
Explanation:
The sunk-cost fallacy refers to the behavior done by the individuals when they continue such behavior because they already invested resources on it (time, money, effort).
In this example, <u>Les invested money on the megaphone of root beer,</u> he starts drinking it but <u>he becomes full, nevertheless he keeps drinking it </u>(even when his friend tells him he will get sick) <u>because he "bought it and not going to waste one drop of it"</u>
<u>Less continues drinking the root beer even though he's already full because he thinks he already invested money on buying it.</u>
Thus, this is an example of the sunk-cost fallacy.
they choose to handle things in a manner that is more beneficial. without an organized approach there would be complete chaos. having this system we are able to deal with differences in a more civilized manner. that's how its intended.
Answer:
Social Referencing.
Explanation:
Social Referencing is a process in which an infant learns to take cues from the behaviors, emotions, and actions of the adults around them, especially parents or caretakers. In this process, they take cues by looking at the facial expressions of parents or caretakers to know how to respond in a certain situation.
<u>In the given case, Regina's looking at her mother when an unfamiliar man approached her exemplifies social referencing. She was referring to the facial expressions of her mother on how to react at this approach of a strange person</u>.
Thus the correct answer is social referencing.
The bigger the tomb the wealthier you were the smaller the not so wealthy
