Answer: Trial Jury
A trial jury, also known as a petit jury, decides whether the defendant committed the crime as charged in a criminal case, or whether the defendant injured the plaintiff in a civil case.
Consists of 6-12 people.
Trials are generally public, but jury deliberations are private.
Defendants have the right to appear, testify, and call witnesses on their behalf.
Final outcome is a verdict, in favor of plaintiff or defendant in a civil case, or guilty/not guilty in a criminal case.
Grand Jury
A grand jury is presented with evidence from the U.S. attorney, the prosecutor in federal criminal cases. The grand jury determines whether there is “probable cause” to believe the individual has committed a crime and should be put on trial. If the grand jury determines there is enough evidence, an indictment will be issued against the defendant.
Consists of 16-23 people.
Grand jury proceedings are not open to the public.
Defendants and their attorneys do not have the right to appear before the grand jury.
Explanation: bench trial is a trial by judge, as opposed to a trial by jury. The term applies most appropriately to any administrative hearing in relation to a summary offense to distinguish the type of trial. Many legal systems (Roman, Islamic) use bench trials for most or all cases or for certain types of cases.
Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is loss in inventory or land and profit calculation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
An employer or a businessman can claim indemnity or insurance in case his employee commits property theft under the Employee theft coverage. This coverage can help for indemnifying the loss of property, money or securities as result of theft by the employee.
However, inventory shortages are not covered under this cover if the only proof available is profit and loss calculation. But if there is other proof like video of the theft, etc. then such loss can also be covered under this insurance scheme.
The most likely answer is that the victims should not be able to sue the manufacturer of a violent game for a design effect. This is because it is difficult to establish a direct connection between the video game and the mass shooting. It is likely that thousands, or even millions of other people have played the game constantly and have not developed these tendencies. Moreover, even if the tendencies were developed, this would not mean that the thoughts would develop into action. Thefore, it is unlikely that the manufacturer would be considered liable.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
it reduces trust for the same reason we dont like Russians spying on us.
Answer:
They would hold the put the restricting tape around the crime scene.
Look for nearby people that could have actually been tricking you and done the crime.
Call an ambulence if anyone was hurt
Hope u get it right!
