1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nuetrik [128]
2 years ago
11

Whats the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause?​

Law
1 answer:
yanalaym [24]2 years ago
6 0
Reasonable suspicion has been defined by the United States Supreme Court as "the sort of common-sense conclusion about human behavior upon which practical people . . . are entitled to rely.

probable cause a reasonable person would believe that a crime was in the process of being committed
You might be interested in
What would be the likely punishment for a crime classified as a misdemeanor by the California Penal Code?
Darya [45]

Answer:

“Standard” California misdemeanors, punishable by up to 6 months in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000; 1and. “Gross” or “aggravated” misdemeanors,” punishable by up to 364 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000 or more.

8 0
3 years ago
hypothetically let's just say that I pushed a couple of people into a tv, specifically, a CRT. How do I make sure that the Japan
Anastaziya [24]

First of all, none of that is even scientifically possibly, so you won't even come close to pushing people into a tv or a CRT, EVER in your ENTIRE LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Legislative Branch of the United States is NOT entrusted with which of the powers listed below?
dybincka [34]

It should be: Command of the Armed Forces is the right answer

7 0
2 years ago
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
aleksklad [387]

Answer:

In order of what you said,

1. Motion for Suppression

2. Motion for Continuance

3. Motion for Discovery

4. Motion for Bill of Particulars

Explanation:

I got this correct.

PLATO gang

7 0
2 years ago
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burde
BigorU [14]

I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.

<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>

This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.

It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ  the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.

Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Alcohol abuse is intentional overuse.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    10·1 answer
  • ______ deterrence is directed toward individual offenders to discourage reoffending.
    7·1 answer
  • The primary actions the state can take against your drivers liscence are
    13·1 answer
  • Help me with this lol.
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me I’m not too sure about this one thank you if you help
    9·1 answer
  • What system did merchants in the early centuries use to make commercial
    7·1 answer
  • If you have an idea for a new law, what can you do to get the government to consider passing it? Choose the best answer.
    11·1 answer
  • Which courts are tribunals created by congress to handle specialized types of cases?
    6·1 answer
  • The traditional model of the political spectrum defines political opinion based on which of the following?
    5·1 answer
  • Approximately __% of vehicular collisions are the direct result of a vehicle skidding.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!