Answer:
gracias por los puntosdssss
Answer: The correct answer is "c. bounded rationality".
Explanation: Jacob's decision is an example of bounded rationality, because according to the theory of limited rationality, people make decisions only partially in a rational way because of our cognitive, information and time constraints.
<span>Sales during the last four periods are in the order from older to recent as 100, 200, 130, and 300.
Moving average is a successive average calculated from the successive segments.
So the third month moving average MA3 = (200 + 130 + 300) / 3 = 630 / 3 = 210
So the answer is 210.</span>
Answer:
The following scenarios are either not accounted for or measured inaccurately by either the income or the expenditure methods of calculating GDP for the United States
B) The costs of overfishing and other overly intensive uses of resources.
C) The value of baby-sitting services, when the babysitter is paid in cash and the transaction isn't reported to the government.
D) The leisure time enjoyed by Americans
Explanation:
GDP is a tool that is used to measure a nation's economic performance, However, it has limitations due to its exclusion of non-market transactions.
- The limitations identified can be summarized as:
- GDP does not incorporate any measures of welfare.
- GDP only includes market transactions.
- GDP does not describe income distribution.
- GDP does not describe what is being produced.
- GDP ignores externalities.
Question Completion with Options:
a. Susan cannot deduct the $80,000 loss from the restaurant because she is not a material participant.
b. Susan can offset the $80,000 loss against the $150,000 of income from the retail store.
c. Susan will not be able to deduct any losses from the restaurant until she has been retired for at least three years.
d. Assuming Susan continues to hold the interest in the restaurant, she will always treat the losses as active.
Answer:
Susan
b. Susan can offset the $80,000 loss against the $150,000 of income from the retail store.
Explanation:
Susan can offset the $80,000 loss from the restaurant business against the income from the retail store because she has been an active and material participant in both businesses. For the past 20 years, she had participated materially in the restaurant, only just retiring this year. At least, she has passed the material participant test, number 5.
