1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
solong [7]
3 years ago
7

Describe relations between Japan and Korea in the late 1500s. plz i need help

Social Studies
2 answers:
Juliette [100K]3 years ago
8 0

The Japanese invasions of Korea of 1592–1598 or Imjin War involved two separate yet linked invasions: an initial invasion in 1592 (Imjin Disturbance), a brief truce in 1596, and a second invasion in 1597 (Chongyu War). The conflict ended in 1598 with the withdrawal of the Japanese forces[1][21] from the Korean Peninsula after a military stalemate[22] in Korea's southern coastal provinces.[23] It ultimately resulted in Joseon Korean and Ming Chinese victory and the expulsion of Japan from the peninsula.

The invasions were launched by Toyotomi Hideyoshi with the intent of conquering the Korean Peninsula and China, which were respectively ruled by the Joseon and Ming dynasties. Japan quickly succeeded in occupying large portions of the Korean Peninsula, but the contribution of reinforcements by the Ming,[24][25][26] as well as the disruption of Japanese supply fleets along the western and southern coasts by the Joseon navy,[27][28][29][30] forced a withdrawal of Japanese forces from Pyongyang and the northern provinces to the south in Busan and nearby regions. Afterwards, with righteous armies (Joseon civilian militias)[31] launching guerrilla warfare against the Japanese and supply difficulties hampering both sides, neither were able to mount a successful offensive or gain any additional territory, resulting in a military stalemate. The first phase of the invasion lasted from 1592 until 1596, and was followed by ultimately unsuccessful peace negotiations between Japan and the Ming between 1596 and 1597.

weqwewe [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

For over 15 centuries, the relationship between Japan and Korea was characterized by cultural exchanges, economic trade, political contact and military confrontations, all of which underlie their relations even today. During the ancient era, exchanges of cultures and ideas between Japan and mainland Asia were common through migration via the Korean Peninsula, and diplomatic contact and trade between the two.

Since 1945, relations involve three states: North Korea, South Korea and Japan. Japan cut off Korea from Qing Chinese suzerainty and for Japan, a high priority in the late 19th century, fighting wars with those two countries on the issue. Japan took control of Korea with the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty of 1910. When Japan was defeated in World War II, Soviet forces took control of the North, and American forces took control of the South, with the 38th parallel as the agreed-upon dividing line. South Korea became independent as of August 15, 1945, and North Korea as of September 9, 1945. In June 1950, North Korea invaded and almost conquered South Korea, but was driven back by the United Nations command, leading South Korean, American, European and international forces. North Korea was nearly captured, with the United Nations intending to roll back Communism there.[1] However, China entered the war, pushed the UN forces out of North Korea, and a military stalemate resulted along the lines similar to the 38th parallel. An armistice was agreed on in 1953, which is still in effect, and the cease-fire line of that year remains the boundary between North and South.[2]

Diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea were established in 1965. In the early 2000s, the Japanese–South Korean relationship soured when the Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi visited the Yasukuni Shrine every year during his term. Furthermore, conflicts continue to exist over claims of the Liancourt Rocks (known in Korea as "Dokdo") – a group of small islets near Korean island "Ulleungdo".

Bilaterally and through the Six-Party Talks, North Korea and Japan continue to discuss the case of Japanese citizens abducted by the North Korean government during the 1970s and 1980s, although there are no existent diplomatic relations between the two; Japan does not recognize North Korea as a sovereign state.

In recent decades, disputes over history and history textbooks have soured relations between Japan and the two Koreas. The debate has exacerbated nationalist pride and animosity, as teachers and professors become soldiers in an intellectual war over events more than a half-century old or even two millennia older. Efforts to reach compromise agreements have failed. Meanwhile, a much less controversial, less politicized and more study-oriented historiography has flourished in Western nations.[3][4] In 2013, polls reported that 94% of Koreans believe Japan "Feels no regret for its past wrongdoings," while 63% of Japanese state that Korean demands for Japanese apologies are "Incomprehensible".[5]

Explanation:

You might be interested in
B9 takes a throw-in, which his goalkeeper, B1, traps with his feet. B1 then dribbles the ball into the penalty area and picks it
vichka [17]

Answer:

In soccer, a back pass or a throw-in to a goalkeeper during the match means that the goalkeeper’s only option is to use his legs or other parts of the body with the exception of the hands to play the ball.

In a case where the goalkeeper handles the ball with his hands, the referee would blow for a foul and an indirect free kick will be awarded to the opposition inside the penalty area where the ball handling took place.

8 0
3 years ago
Who controlled korea in the 1700s?
alexgriva [62]

Japanese government was modeled after the system in  China.  What are the choices for the question?

3 0
3 years ago
Where did japan decide to attack instead of the Philippines
Kisachek [45]

The U.S.

At least that is what I think, which is what caused Pearl Harbor Attack

4 0
3 years ago
Give 3 examples of Public communications
kupik [55]
1) Newspapers
2) Television
3) Raido
7 0
3 years ago
How do the section headings help refine the claim that pet food labels do not always tell the whole story? a.The headings list,
VLD [36.1K]

Answer: Hello! Apparently, your question is lacking the text to which it is based. Luckily, we were able to find it! The link to it is https://questioncove.com/updates/5c40e3765ce5b8758b5e7c00 . But be careful! The question above it is different from the one asked here, so focus only on the text itself. Here goes the answer to your question:

The correct alternative which explains the effect of the headings in this excerpt is alternative B, since many different aspects, such as production, nutrition, historical aspects and common sense facts are shown in it. They are very helpful due to the strategy used: explanations in a simple, direct way.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The principal trial courts in texas are the ____ courts.
    7·1 answer
  • Modernization theorists argue that third world nations are underdeveloped because of
    5·1 answer
  • The political spectrum spans communism on the extreme left to blank on the extreme right
    8·1 answer
  • Each supreme court justice is assigned ________ law clerks
    5·1 answer
  • PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ HELP ASAP FIRST ONE TO ANSWER WILL GET BRAINLEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • What reflection occurs when light hits an irregular surface?
    11·2 answers
  • If you were Germany, would you have preferred the Fourteen points agreement or the
    6·1 answer
  • Why has wal-mart viewed international expansion as a critical part of its strategy??
    10·1 answer
  • How have economic sanctions hurt North Korea? Why do other countries, like the United States, place sanctions on North Korea? (d
    5·2 answers
  • For many people, a screwdriver is a better _____ of a tool than is a shingle froe
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!