In order to paraphrase a text you should understand each paragraph's main ideas and then think of other citations and examples of your own to complete the logic of it.
1 - The Beard interpretation has two main problems: first, there isn’t in the Constitution any confession or strong sign of the influence from those who believed the fundamental private rights of property being fundamentally anterior to government and morally unreachable for the popular majorities; second, it is impossible to deny the Constitution as a document in federalism.
2 - These problems should be addressed. The second is simple for it is consensual amongst Revolutionary era historians that the big question of that moment was: how to articulate diverse parts of an empire towards common purposes? And how to realize that articulation without taking one side more than another, without transforming demands for liberty and autonomy into central government undermining. It can be argued that’s the same debate over Federal aid to education.
3 - The Declaratory Act was a declaration of the British failure in solving this same problem, about which Edmund Burke sharply observed the impossibility of arguing anyone into slavery. When it was time for Americans to deal with this dilemma the Articles of Confederation were adequate when discussing the distribution of powers but lacking in sanctions. This deficiency was the cause of the Philadelphia Convention.
4 - Although Beard’s interpretation is convincing when arguing that those who wrote the Constitution belonged to the propertied classes, he is not as convincing about this being reflected on the Constitution itself. If the framers were trying to protect their property they didn’t succeed. Our analysis of the Economic Interpretation of the Constitution shows that the auteur’s reading of that historical moment fails to legitimate itself when confronted with the Constitution’s text. What each of the framers did after the Constitution and how it was directly linked to his class isn’t enough proof of the auteur’s argument if it isn’t shown also through the Constitution.
Considering the available options, the economic activities that would be found or that most likely would succeed in Virginia are the following:
Large-Scale Agriculture (plantation) requiring a lot of laborers and flat to gently rolling land:
- This is evident in the fact that tobacco plantation was largely grown in the Virginia colony.
Fishing and whaling due to proximity to the ocean:
- This is evident in the fact that various rivers and water are available in the Virginia colony.
Timbering, Pine Tar, Pitch, Sassafras (for medicine), and Potash;
- This is evident in the fact that there are various forests in the Virginia colony.
Maple syrup and livestock products such as wool:
- Various forests have Maple trees in Virginia and acceptable weather for raising livestock.
Industries requiring long, hot summers, shorter, cold winters:
- This is evident in the fact that the colony of Virginia is characterized by hot summers, shorter, cold winters.
Waterways with steep drop-offs and rapids to utilize waterpower:
- This is evident in the fact that there are various water bodies like rivers around the Virginia colony.
Glass and barrel making:
- this is evident in the fact that the colony of Virginia originally began glass and barrel making before switching to tobacco farming later.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that it is only the last option, "Industries that can be done with short summers, longer, colder winters," that would not succeed in the Virginia colony because the colony's climate did not support such venture.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17336914
I believe it would be Euripides
Answer:
The battle on September 19 began when Burgoyne moved some of his troops in an attempt to flank the entrenched American position on Bemis Heights. Benedict Arnold anticipated the maneuver and placed significant forces in his way.
Explanation:
