The argument above is a deductive reasoning. A deductive reasoning draws a conclusion from a series of premises that are held to be true. The argument also employs no informal fallacy. The confusion lies though on the first premise if it is true.
The agent of Lisa would likely tell her about the process and the rules in regards of the disability buy and sell insurance. The agent would likely explain that if she acquired this type, the insured person would likely be protected when the person has exhibit a disability and that having this type of insurance have benefits and are likely to be tax free.
Answer:
Desing A is a better deal as the equivalent annual cost is lower than desing B
Anywa, bot desing cost are above the city collections thus, it cannot afford the sanitary systems unless it raises taxes
Explanation:
<em><u>Desing A </u></em>
F0 405,000
operating and maintenance cost 51,000 for 14 years
Present value of the operating and maintenance cost:
C = $ 51,000.00
time = 14 years
rate = 0.07
PV $446,018.8673
net worth: $ 851,081.87
equivalent annual cost:
PV 851,082
time 14
rate 0.07
C $ 97,316.904
<u><em>Desing B</em></u>
F0 251,000
operating and maintenance cost 89,000 for 14 years
C 89,000.00
time 14
rate 0.07
PV $778,346.6507
net worth: $ 1,029,346.65
equivalent annual cost:
C $ 117,700.580
Answer:
it might be informative and persuasive I'm pretty sure it is but not 100% I'm sorry