Answer:
From the given sentence and question, no verb is highlighted, but from the sentence, "If the speaker had been on time, the program would have begun on time", you can see that there is tautology as the word "on time" is used twice in the sentence when it could have been used only once.
Therefore, to correct this tautology, the sentence can be rewritten as: "If the speaker had been on time, the program would have begun early".
As a result of this, there is no incorrect verb form in the sentence, so it is safe to assume that the highlighted verb is correct.
Answer:
Explanation:
Pertaining to the interrogate for question 1.
“The narrator’s purpose in the first stanza is to”:
(3) propose an attitude towards life.
- The remnant answer choices are not considered or disclosed as logical or absurd as the relation between those answer choices, as well as the details stated, do not share any reasonable or observable information.
Pertaining to the interrogate for question 2.
“The words “weights heavier” (line 21) imply that”:
*Line 21 within the poem anecdote is not present, hence I cannot answer that question.
*I hope this helps.
Answer:
A best describes the answer.
Explanation:
Because B is cost to the passage
C cannot be the answer because the narrator himself utter the words
D is far enough from the answer as there is no such words used as chest in the parragraph
Answer on edge is B) subordinating conjunction.
