Agonists activate the receptor thereby <u>increasing</u> activity at the synapse while antagonists generally prevent agonists from activating the receptors thereby <u>decreasing</u> activity at the synapse.
- An agonist is the component that has the ability to increase the activity carried out by another substance.
- The agonists work from their faculty of coupling to a cell-type receptor, in this way, they manage to generate a certain action in the cell.
- The antagonists are the compounds that cause the opposite when they bind to the receptor, they cause a blockade by decreasing the activation of a synaptic receptor.
Therefore, we can conclude that agonists are compounds capable of increasing the action of synapse and blockers (antagonists) decrease activity at the synapse.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/11985070
Answer:
9/256
Explanation:
According to Mendel's experiments the results for the heterozygous are in the ratio 3:1
As each gene is considered separately and the multiplication rule is used. Therefore the probability of getting a solid color would be 1/4 and black fur would be 3/4. Similarly the probability of getting the colored fur is 3/4 and getting a piebald( white patches) is 1/4
Then the combined probability is (1/4*3/4*1/4*3/4)= 9/256
Answer:
One controversy that has resulted from the Human Genome Project is the ethics of genetic engineering and whether it should be used to create so-called "designer babies." Proponents of genetic engineering argue that it has the potential to eliminate genetic disorders and diseases, and that it could improve the overall health and well-being of future generations. For example, parents could use genetic engineering to ensure that their children have a lower risk of developing conditions like diabetes or heart disease.
On the other hand, opponents of genetic engineering argue that it could lead to a number of social and ethical problems. For instance, some people worry that genetic engineering could be used to create a society of genetically superior individuals, leading to inequality and discrimination. Additionally, opponents argue that we do not yet fully understand the potential risks and long-term effects of genetic engineering, and that we should therefore proceed with caution. They also raise concerns about the potential misuse of genetic engineering, such as using it to create individuals with enhanced physical or intellectual abilities for military or other nefarious purposes.
In conclusion, while genetic engineering has the potential to bring many benefits, there are also valid concerns about its potential consequences. It is important for society to carefully consider these issues and to proceed with caution.
Explanation:
, in its simplest and least complex form, is the skeleton of primitive, more advanced, and in some common, modern day organisms.[1]
While more advanced organisms can be considered hydrostatic, they are
sometimes referred to as hydrostatic for their possession of a
hydrostatic organ instead of a hydrostatic skeleton. A hydrostatic organ
and a hydrostatic skeleton may have the same capabilities, but they are
not the same.[1]
Hydrostatic organs are more common in advanced organisms, while
hydrostatic skeletons are more common in primitive organisms. As its
name suggests, containing hydro meaning "water", being hydrostatic means
that the skeleton or organ is fluid-filled.<span>[2]
</span>
