1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hoa [83]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following best describes how imperial power shifted during the last half of the 19th century?

History
1 answer:
MAXImum [283]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Spain declined as a global power, while new players such as the United States emerged as global powers in Latin America and Asia.

Explanation:

I believe this is correct because as Spain declined in power, the US rose. Also following the Spanish-American War in 1898, quickly emerged as new imperial powers in East Asia and in the Pacific Ocean area.

You might be interested in
Bernard de Gálvez led troops to victory in Florida at in 1781.
uysha [10]
Is this a true or false question

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mercantilists believe a country shoulda. export more goods then it imports.
Rufina [12.5K]

Anti-Federalists argued that

branches of government would keep each other in balance.it was impossible to separate government into equal branches.the Constitution would create a Republican government.<span>a Republic should protect people from the government and from each other.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
How did the institution of slavery expand in the south in the early 1800s and what were living conditions like for slaves during
exis [7]

When the Declaration of Independence was drafted in 1776 the founding fathers failed to establish slavery. Some of them were slave owners.

The northern states took after the war of independence many measures against slavery. For example Vermont banned it in 1777 and Massachusetts in 1783.

In the southern states, on the contrary, accelerated progress was made in the institutionalization and expansion of slavery.

The Congress passed in 1793 a law against slaves fleeing their masters. In 1808 the slave trade was banned and in 1809 the participation in it of Americans was forbidden; but slavery was not forbidden.

When the aboriginal territories and those previously colonized by Spain and France were annexed to the national territory, (annexation of Kentucky, 1792, Tennessee, 1796, Ohio, 1803, French Louisiana, 1803, which includes Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, etc., Florida, 1819) slave activity was consolidated in the new southern states of the Union. In 1820 the Masson-Nixon line was drawn, establishing the separation between slave states to the south and non-slave states to the north.

The combination of the prohibition of trafficking but the non-prohibition of the practice of slavery brought with it the smuggling of slaves and with it a large increase in the price of slaves. This influenced in a better treatment and care on the part of the masters to its slaves.

In general there were two types of slaves, those of household service and plantation workers. The latter had to perform approximately 16 hours of daily work, lived in not very well-built huts and ate. The food was monotonous: salted pork, a bushel of cornmeal and molasses, sometimes vegetables and, when they bought or stolen, a chicken.



3 0
3 years ago
using document 2 identify identify Emperor Jahangir's point of view concerning English merchants in the Mughal empire
NeTakaya

Answer:

Hello. You did not attach the document that the question refers to. However, I can help you by stating that Emperor Jahangir had a positive view of English merchants in the Mughal empire.

Explanation:

Jahangir was the ruler of the Mogul Empire between the years 1605 and 1627. He saw the commercial relationship between the Mongols and the English much more profitable than the relationship he had previously with the Portuguese and therefore he thought that the presence of English merchants in the Mughal empire. This can be seen in the letter he sent to King James I, where in a very polite way he demonstrates the desire to establish friendship and cooperation between the two nations.

3 0
3 years ago
Explain Hammurabi’s Code 138
Effectus [21]

Answer:

138. If a man wishes to separate from his wife who has borne him no children, he shall give her the amount of her purchase money and the dowry which she brought from her father's house, and let her go. ... If he be a freed man he shall give her one-third of a mina of gold. 141

Explanation:

hope it help

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How long did WW2 last? I've got an essay due at skool, and its on WW2. But when i looked on the internet, i got alot of differen
    5·1 answer
  • What impact did industrialization have on imperialism?
    11·1 answer
  • Who led the battle of put-in-Bay?
    9·1 answer
  • The passage of that law marked a turning point in the civil rights movement?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true regarding the Soviet Union under Lenin? . . I have narrowed it down to:. 1. The govern
    5·1 answer
  • What was the currency act
    15·1 answer
  • Antifederalist argues that
    9·1 answer
  • What enabled the transformation from hunter-gathering societies to farming societies?
    11·1 answer
  • Pls answer and don't just comment for the points
    10·2 answers
  • What was the outcome of the Vietnam War?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!