1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zepelin [54]
2 years ago
8

Some researchers have conjectured that stem-pitting disease in peach-tree seedlings might be controlled with weed and soil treat

ment. An experiment is conducted to compare peach-tree seedling growth when the soil and weeds are treated with one of two herbicides. In a field containing 20 seedlings, 10 are randomly selected throughout the field and assigned to receive herbicide A. The remainder of the seedlings is assigned to receive herbicide B. Soil and weeds for each seedling are treated with the appropriate herbicide, and at the end of the study period, the height in centimeters is recorded for each seedling. The following results are obtained: Herbicide A = 94.5 cm s1 = 10 cm Herbicide B = 109.1 cm s2 = 9 cm
What is a 90% confidence interval (use the conservative value for the degrees of freedom) for μ2 – μ1? a. 14.6 ± 7.00 b. 14.6 ± 7.38 c. 14.6 ± 7.80 d. 14.6 ± 9.62

Suppose we wish to determine if there tends to be a difference in height for the seedlings treated with the different herbicides. To answer this question, we decide to test the hypotheses H0: μ2 – μ1 = 0, Ha: μ2 – μ1 ≠ 0. What is the value of the two-sample t statistic? a. 14.6 b. 3.43 c. 2.54 d. 7.80

What can we say about the value of the P-value? a. P-value < 0.01 b. 0.01 < P-value < 0.05 c. 0.05 < P-value < 0.10 d. P-value > 0.10

If you use the 0.05 level of significance, what conclusion would you reach? a. The evidence is not sufficiently strong to reject the null hypothesis. b. There is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. c. Cannot be determined by the information given.
Mathematics
1 answer:
stiks02 [169]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Part A

b. 14.6 ± 7.38

Part B

b. 3.43

Part C

a. P-value < 0.01

Part D

b. There is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A

The given data are;

The number of seedlings in the field = 20

The number of seedlings selected to receive herbicide A = 10

The number of seedlings selected to receive herbicide B = 10

The height in centimeters of seedlings treated with Herbicide A, \overline x _1 = 94.5 cm

The standard deviation, s₁ = 10 cm

The height in centimeters of seedlings treated with Herbicide B, \overline x _2 = 109.1 cm

The standard deviation, s₂ = 9 cm

The 90% confidence interval for μ₂ - μ₁, is given as follows;

\left (\bar{x}_{2}- \bar{x}_{1}  \right )\pm t_{\alpha /2}\sqrt{\dfrac{s_{1}^{2}}{n_{1}}+\dfrac{s_{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}

The critical-t at 95% and n₁ + n₂ - 2 degrees of freedom is given as follows;

The degrees of freedom, df = n₁ + n₂ - 2 = 10 + 10 - 2 = 18

α = 100% - 90% = 10%

∴ For two tailed test, we have, α/2 = 10%/2 = 5% = 0.05

t_{(0.025, \, 18)} = 1.734

C.I. = \left (109.1- 94.5 \right )\pm 1.734 \times \sqrt{\dfrac{10^{2}}{10}+\dfrac{9^{2}}{10}}

C.I. ≈ 14.6 ± 7.37714603353

The 90% C.I. ≈ 14.6 ± 7.38

b. 14.6 ± 7.38

Part B

With the hypotheses are given as follows;

H₀; μ₂ - μ₁ = 0

Hₐ; μ₂ - μ₁ ≠ 0

The two sample t-statistic is given as follows;

t=\dfrac{(\bar{x}_{2}-\bar{x}_{1})}{\sqrt{\dfrac{s_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}+\dfrac{s _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}

t-statistic=\dfrac{(109.1-94.5)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{10^{2} }{10}+\dfrac{9^{2}}{10}}} \approx 3.43173361147

The two sample t-statistic ≈ 3.43

b. 3.43

Part C

From the t-table, the p-value, we have, the p-value < 0.01

a. P-value < 0.01

Part D

Given that a significance level of 0.05 level is used and the p-value of 0.01 is less than the significance level, there is enough statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis

b. There is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

You might be interested in
For fun, if X=180 and Y=20 then what is (Y-X)x(53-33)+3,269= ???? For fun
Masja [62]

Answer:

6,469!

Step-by-step explanation:

180-20=160

53-33=20

160*20=3,200

3,269+3,200=6,469

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following correctly describes the variation in the equation r=d/t?
maw [93]
Answer number 3 is correct.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what would be your mortgage payment if you pay for a 250000 home by making a 20% down payment and then taking out a 3.74% thirty
sergejj [24]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
I need help with this it’s timed
8090 [49]

Answer:

Option 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The coordinates match it

4 0
2 years ago
Help quick please
GaryK [48]

Answer:

Growth

Step-by-step explanation:

since the (1.05) is bigger than 1 it is growth but if it was lower then  1 it would be decay .

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 19. Given that the lines are parallel, what angle is congruent to angle 6?
    5·2 answers
  • plz this is easy just answer Use &lt; or &gt; to compare the integers. –14 and –3 A. –14 &gt; –3 B. –14 &lt; –3
    7·1 answer
  • The perimeter of a parallelogram is 72 meters.The width of the parallelogram is four meters less than its length. Find the lengt
    11·1 answer
  • 14 is 89% of what number
    13·1 answer
  • Clare travels at a constant speed, as shown on the double number line
    15·1 answer
  • Please help!!!!!!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Solve the system of equations by substitution:<br> y = 3x – 7<br> 6x- 2y= 12
    12·1 answer
  • Find the value.<br><br><br> 9 × 10[2]
    13·2 answers
  • Help pleaseeeee!!!!! i stg if no one answers correctly im gonna have another mental breakdown
    14·1 answer
  • -8c^2--6c^ 2 I need help!!!!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!