The more firms get from obligation as opposed to issuing stocks, the more it can diminish the aggregate cost of capital in light of the fact that the enthusiasm from obligation is duty deductible which will help reduce the aggregate cost of capital. In any case, no firm can get from obligation everlastingly in light of the fact that, at one point in time, extra obligation financing will make the aggregate cost of capital increment rather than decline. So firms will get in view of their own enhanced capital structure to limit the aggregate cost of capital however much as could reasonably be expected. Also, in light of this upgraded capital structure, there is a point of confinement to how much a firm can keep getting from obligation.
The time value of money is the idea that an amount of money in the present is more valuable and is worth more than the amount of money in the future. Two things you'd need to consider when making this type of deal is putting yourself at risk of not getting the money and putting your trust into the person who owns you the money. You would need to consider that putting yourself in that position is your decision, no one elses. Ask yourself, "Can I trust this person?" or, "What if I don't get as much money as they promised?"
I hope this helps!
Answer:Telling style leadership
Explanation: According to Hersey and Blanchard’s situational model of leadership, The telling style is an authoritarian type of leadership ususally directed or used with low- maturity followers where the leader gives explicit directions and instructions on how tasks should be performed and orders are not subject to interpretation
This type of leadership usually occurs when the leader has an expertise in the area which he or she specializes and so gives clear, precise quick and controlled instructions for efficient implementation.
Here, Sandra uses the Telling style leadership to accomplish tasks and performances.
