Answer:
a film of the French New Wave
Explanation:
Based on this description it seems that Jean Pierre is making a film of the French New Wave. This was an art film movement that emerged in the late 1950s and 60's becoming one of the most influential in cinema history. This was all due to its rejection of traditional filmmaking conventions in order to pursue more unique film methodology and experimentation. Using new approaches to editing, visual style, and narrative.
Judge Evans also opposes any statutory limitations on his sentencing discretion. Judge Evans most likely is a proponent of indeterminate sentencing.
<h3>
What is indeterminate sentencing?</h3>
When a penalty for a crime is provided as a range, the sentencing structure is known as an indeterminate one. A defendant might receive a sentence of "15 years to life in prison," for instance. A minimum prison time is always specified in cases of indeterminate sentencing, but a release date is never specified. A state parole board often decides the precise release date after reviewing a case.
Both indeterminate sentencing provides for the early release of prisoners. A parole board will normally grant early release in an indeterminate system if inmates can show that they have rehabilitated themselves.
Learn more about indeterminate sentencing here:
brainly.com/question/4522667
#SPJ4
Answer:
mission statement
Explanation:
A well worked-out mission statement provides company employees with a shared sense of purpose, direction, and opportunity.
Mission statement provide a clearly stated purpose of your business and the goals you have for succeeding. A good mission statement will inspire and motivate employees
Answer:
The concept a social psychologist might use is the self-fulfilling prophecy.
Explanation:
A result of the Pygmalion effect, self-fulfilling prophecy explains that we are influenced by other people's expectations of us. If people believe we will succeed, we too begin to believe we will succeed. We then change our behavior, aligning it with the belief, making a self-fulfilling prophecy out of it.
Since the teacher was told she was teaching an honors section of psychology, and she believed it, she taught that class in a way that led it to the results an honors section would indeed present. The teacher was already biased - in a positive way - when she started teaching this class, which led her to see them in a favorable light. Such attitude ended up making the class perform better, as if it were truly an honors section.
This isn't true. Parents aren't able to grant consent to a minor to have sex with someone of legal age - it wouldn't really make sense for parents to be able to determine the lives of their children whne they are still minors. For that reason, this statement is false.
