Answer:The Intolerable Acts were a series of laws passed by the British Parliament in the mid-1770s. The British instated the acts to make an example of the colonies after the Boston Tea Party, and the outrage they caused became the major push that led to the outbreak American Revolution in 1775.
Explanation:
The Tea Act, passed by Parliament on May 10, 1773, granted the British East India Company Tea a monopoly on tea sales in the American colonies. ... The policy ignited a “powder keg” of opposition and resentment among American colonists and was the catalyst of the Boston Tea Party.
Answer:
the gospel
Explanation:
The Gospel is the word of god called the good news
I briefly learned about the Aztec and Inca's and from what I know, Cortes and Pizarro were both Spanish conquistadors. Cortes conquered the Aztec empire brutally, killing many common people as well as soldiers, much of Aztecs wealth was taken away and the Aztec people lived under Spanish rule for approximately 300 years.
I suggest reading back into your lesson and taking notes; it helps a lot!
Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
Since he smelled the skunk minutes before they sat down, then, we can say Manuel has a lower <u>absolute threshold</u> for the skunk odor than his parents have.
Absolute threshold refers to the smallest level of energy required by an external stimulus to be detectable by the human senses.
- Here, Manuel has a lower absolute threshold because little energy is required of him to detect the skunk odour.
In conclusion, Manuel has a lower <u>absolute threshold</u> for the skunk odor than his parents have
Read more about Absolute threshold:
<em>brainly.com/question/21681525</em>
