Answer:
C. a well-told story should have no need for subsequent discussion
Explanation:
When a person tells a story in a presentation, it is false that a well-told story should not have need for further discussions.
No matter how good a story is or how well it is explained, there should always be room for further discussion, either in form of asking questions for clarity or discussing some points in the story.
It isnt dark or sunny, because it clearly states "hidden in mist and cloud". So for a while i was between misty and cloudy. However I believe it is misty, because cloudy normally means that the sky is clouded, and in the passage it says that it is hidden. Now, i dont know about you, but clouds in the sky have never hidden anything but the sun from me. I think it means that it was as if there was a cloud on earth and that the cloud of mist hid where the men of winter live. Therefore, I believe the answer is the second choice, misty. Hope that helps! Please vote this answer the branliest, too! :)
Adjective is a describing word...its BROKEN
"The Snow Queen"
This is a famous fairy tale written in 1844 by<span> Hans Christian Andersen who was a Danish author. This is an original fairy tale.
The story got such fame that it is always included in the story collections of Andersen and in almost every illustrated book printed for children. </span>
1. His argument is that the two boys should not be sentenced to death, and that the "Wild and extravagant stories were freely published as if they were fact." Should not be used against the boys, due to their status of wealth. He argues that never before has a minor been sentenced to death in the state of Illinois and that the media frenzy around the case should not be used in their conviction.
2."And I think I am safe in saying, although I have not examined all the records and could not, but I think I am safe in saying that never has there been such a case in the state of Illinois."
"Why need a judge be urged by every argument, moderate and immoderate, to hang two boys in the face of every precedent in Illinois and in the face of progress of the last 50—at least twenty-five—years?"<span>
He uses persuasive language to lessen the impact of the case against the boys, by calling into question the legal system and the humanity of the judge as well as the historical cases in the state of Illinois.</span>
