The reason that Larceny is easier to detect that skimming
because this is associated with having to steal the cash only after that it has
been recorded by the accounting system of the company in which makes it easier
to detect unlike skimming. The answer is letter b.
Answer:
See below.
Explanation:
To compute the change in money supply, we first calculate the credit multiplier,
Credit multiplier is calculated as,
Multiplier = 1 / reserve ratio
When the Bank of Tazi loans 10 million to bank while their reserve requirements stay the same, this additional 10 million will be loaned out and the total change in money supply would be
= 10 million * Multiplier
For example if the reserve ratio was 4% then the multiplier = 1 /0.04 = 25
Then the total change in money supply would be 10 * 25 = 250 million.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
Antonio and Replacement of Golf Clubs
a. He should cash the CD and use the proceeds to finance part of the golf clubs.
b. The reason is that he would pay more in in-store financing totaling $37.06 per annum than the net interest he would generate from the CD totaling $23.18 per annum. And Antonio would incur a net loss of $13.88 if the CD was renewed unlike the $5.74 if the CD were not renewed.
Explanation:
Option 1: Renew Certificate of Deposit (CD):
Interest earned = $33.48 ($600 * 5.58%)
Taxes = 10.30 ($33.48 * 30.75%)
Net Income = $23.18
Cost of in-store financing = $37.06 ($710 * 5.22%)
Net Loss(overall) = $13.88 ($37.06 - $23.18)
Option 2:
Sale-off of CD = $600
Net financing required = $110 ($710 - $600)
Cost of financing = $5.74 ($110 * 5.22%)
You could say something like "From this day forth all staff in the in-house sales department and <span>the traveling sales department. All men must wear suit and tie, and all women must be dressed in jeans and a long sleeve shirt!?"</span>
Answer:
the overhead amount recorded is $139,500
Explanation:
The computation of the overhead amount recorded is shown below:
= Overhead application rate × direct material cost
= 155% × $90,000
= $139,500
Hence, the overhead amount recorded is $139,500
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come