Answer:
where and what are the statements?
Explanation:
there are no statements
This is one of those questions that you should always qualify by stating that it is a fact specific inquiry.
Depending on the facts presented, a progressive movement's calls for government regulation may be justified if the facts presented show that the call is justified.
If business is routinely defrauding citizens and ignoring tax law, then a progressive movement is right to call for regulation.
If the regulation is poorly written, then the progressive movement should be calling for better regulation and not new regulation.
Answer:
Chinese paifang derived from the torana temple-gate in ancient India, has taken on traditional Chinese architectural characteristics such as multi-tiered roofs, various supporting posts, and archway-shapes of traditional gates and towers.
Explanation:
In <em>Omar Khayyam's "RUBAIYAT OF OMAR KHAYYAM," Edward Fitzgerald </em>noted that pupils of Imam Mowaffak believed that they would all become fabulously rich in this world.
But since there is no certainty in this, the author asks what becomes of the fate of those who could not attain wealthy statuses, despite their strong belief.
Thus, the word<em> "ours" </em>in the first line of the poem refers to the pupils who may fail to become rich, notwithstanding that they <em>strongly believed and hoped</em> for their teacher's lessons to become real in their lives.
Related link: brainly.com/question/17948484
